Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have an in-house, Rust-based proxy server. Claude is unable to contribute to it meaningfully outside of grunt work like minor refactors across many files. It doesn't seem to understand proxying and how it works on both a protocol level and business logic level. With some entirely novel work we're doing, it's actually a hindrance as it consistently tells us the approach isn't valid/won't work (it will) and then ent…
> We have an in-house, Rust-based proxy server. Claude is unable to contribute to it meaningfully outside I have a great time using Claude Code in Rust projects, so I know it's not about the language exactly. My working model is is that since LLM are basically inference/correlation based, the more you deviate from the mainstream corpus of training data, the more confused LLM gets. Because LLM doesn't "understand" any…
Re: Opus 4.5 is not the normal AI agent experience that I have had thus far
#1001hot take (that shouldn't be?): if your code is super easy to follow as a human, it will be super easy to follow for an LLM. (hint: guess where the training data is coming from!)