Earlier quoted context omitted.
So basically it’s like buying a house and finding faults with it that the seller had hidden?
Very much like that...except you're also in a legal system where the courts have ruled that the only "faults" that actually are major enough to count are things like "seller said it was 3br house; it's a one room shack" or "seller neglected to mention it had burnt to the ground last year and hasn't been rebuilt". Something like "Twitter lied, actually 15% of active users are bots, not It's hard to stress enough just…
If Twitter has nothing to hide, then why not give him the complete access he wants? Why should Musk just take Twitter's word?
Musk never intended to buy Twitter. The objective was to expose Twitter as the propaganda machine it is.