seems kind of odd to integrate their own CLI instead of just writing a yo generator - and where is the documentation for it?
Docs are here: http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/.
101–110 of 174 posts
seems kind of odd to integrate their own CLI instead of just writing a yo generator - and where is the documentation for it?
Docs are here: http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
As much as Bootstrap, I imagine. Not sure if moreso or lessso though. Perhaps different use cases? It looks like developers prefer Bootstrap, not entirely sure why - perhaps something as simple as the documentation is structured better for them - or that was the initial crowd who was exposed to it.
It's just that I'm the guy that liked dojo when the world liked jquery. Should I just go with the majority and choose bootstrap?
So for the HTML deficient are there any template sites for foundation yet? These exist for bootstrap, and for someone who doesn't have even a single bone of design talent in his body they're a godsend.
Hi. Our company, Blue Jay Themes, specializes in making good-looking Foundation themes. Please follow us on Twitter and we’ll let you know when we launch in just a couple of weeks. Another great way to stay updated is by subscribing to our newsletter, which can be found on our website. Thanks. http://www.bluejaythemes.com/ http://www.twitter.com/bluejaythemes
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's just that I'm the guy that liked dojo when the world liked jquery. Should I just go with the majority and choose bootstrap?
Foundation's enough of a standard that you don't have to worry about that. It'll be around indefinitely and won't get abandoned like some hobbyist project or superseded by Bootstrap.
Changes of note: "Interchange uses media queries to dynamically load responsive content that is appropriate for different users' browsers.” http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/interchange.html Offcanvas Javascript (Originally bolt-on, not bundled) http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/offcanvas.html "Abide is an HTML5 form validation library that supports the native API by using patterns and required attr…
What do people recommend for functionality similar to Interchange on a Bootstrap 3 site?
Why not just use Interchange itself?
I'm puzzled about the switch from camelCase to snake_case for JS as shown in http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/upgrading.html#javascript-va... . The clear convention in JavaScript is camelCase, why switch away from it? (I say this as someone who in normal life using Python and Rust uses and prefers snake_case but who uses camelCase when writing JavaScript.)
> The clear convention in JavaScript is camelCase, why switch away from it? Citation?
Well, it's sure as hell not window.set_timeout, window.clear_interval, window.on_load, etc.
Changes of note: "Interchange uses media queries to dynamically load responsive content that is appropriate for different users' browsers.” http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/interchange.html Offcanvas Javascript (Originally bolt-on, not bundled) http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/offcanvas.html "Abide is an HTML5 form validation library that supports the native API by using patterns and required attr…
Changes of note: "Interchange uses media queries to dynamically load responsive content that is appropriate for different users' browsers.” http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/interchange.html Offcanvas Javascript (Originally bolt-on, not bundled) http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/offcanvas.html "Abide is an HTML5 form validation library that supports the native API by using patterns and required attr…
I'm curious as to why Zepto support was removed. Zurb was pretty big on it for Foundation 3. Smaller size than jQuery, faster load time on mobile, etc. Any ideas why this was scratched?
Is clicking on Learn suppose to drop the page like this http://imgur.com/yH9OKB3 ? Happens on both Chrome and Firefox.