Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I believe you are wrong about dismissing that top comment in the other post as snarky, negative and useless. Point of order here: he never used the word "useless". He also didn't dismiss the post for being negative (he said "I’m not against negative top comments per se but they should at least be factual"). > 1) Thai law was brought up a number of times and you do appear to be violating it. This is probably somethi…
"Those sentences are snark: sarcastic and snide assertions that do little more than to point out how much the author doesn't know when compared to the commenter. They're not needed, or they could've been phrased much more neutrally" This. A thousand times this. There are always arguments about thick and thin skin, but I can't find any value in being so snide about something. I look at HN comments because I'm looking…
So I plan on doing that more often, now.