The problem with python's website was never that it wasnt "Sexy" enough to attract newcomers. Its that the documentation was never as well written or well organized as other languages/libraries like ruby and jQuery.
I really liked Python's documentation. I read the tutorial and it got me up and running really quickly, and whenever I had a problem or needed details of the arguments it was an invaluable reference. Clearly, not everyone thought so. What did you not like about the docs?
Python.org Redesign Preview
101–110 of 165 posts
Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#102* Too much of this page is spent on navigation and link lists. It's the landing page, but we don't need to link to every single sub-section of the site.
* I don't think having a whole sub-menu on the bottom of the page with various download architectures is a good idea. A single "Downloads" link would be much better, breaking out by distro on the downloads page.
* Ditto for a lot of the other stuff in the bottom menus. I understand we're trying to make things discoverable, but feel that you went too far in the other direction (information overload).
* The mobile style is pretty disappointing. There is a ton of wasted vertical space, and the vast majority of my scrolling is spent getting through all of the various menu levels. This could be trimmed down a ton, there's just too much. Strip out all of the ancillary links, stick to the core content, and make it easy to digest.
I make these comments because I genuinely care. I want to see the new python.org blow our socks off.
Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#103Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#104Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#105Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#106Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#107Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#108Re: Python.org Redesign Preview
#109Looks nice, but my first thought when I looked at the code example: 1 >>> l = ['spam', 'ham', 314, 23] was "wait, how are they assigning a list to the number 1? How is that possible? Oh... that's an l". (Not a fan of that. I'm half blind (figuratively) so these things confuse me.)
Yeah, that example is a placeholder; we plan on replacing it with something awesome. Thanks!