So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
101–110 of 184 posts
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't feel this subtle difference. Take a look: http://imgur.com/CWJWvZk Does this feel different? I can see the slanted Arial terminations but I don't "feel" the different mood.
Hypothesis: The difference in feeling that some people get from fonts is like the difference in feeling many people get when they pay a lot for the wine they drink. It's subconscious. It feels like a real feeling. It just isn't driven by the actual experience of the product. In the wine world, it is possible to isolate this effect using blind taste tests. In the font world, there seems to be no robust way to show a f…
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#103I can tell the difference between them, it's obvious when you know what to look for. Is it so much better that it's worth the effort required? Definitely not in my opinion.
I have a special place reserved in Hell for that font.
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#104After reading tip offs here I got 19/20 (all except Toyota)
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#105Ruining the game for everyone; two things I love about Helvetica — Terminals at right angles to the stroke. http://c.jon.gd/image/3Q0y2u323j3C . Arial looks particularly sloppy with jaunty terminals. It is possible to have a similar grotesque sans-serif feel with offset terminals (see Univers & Akzidenz Grotesk) but they're a crucial part of what give Helvetica its character. - The uppercase R. Has a really strong le…
I immediately got 17/20, missing only the ones where there were no lower case characters. How do you distinguish between in these 3 cases? http://imgur.com/a/NOLoI
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also Helvetice tends to look sligthly "heavier" (thicker) when put side by side with Arial. That gives away many examples at a glance.
The Helvetica is actually slightly thinner in the Mattel example.
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#107* This test quickly 'clued me in' that a logo should give a "commanding", "authoritative", "brooks no argument" look. Helvetica, yes; Ariel, no: Ariel made some logos look downright self-satirical.
* An email client I use has Ariel as its default font. In that (two-way communication) context, where accidental antagonisms can arise, Ariel seems to "look less antagonistic"
* So this test speaks to me about appropriate fonts for two different contexts, and personal point-of-view.
* Got 20/20, but might not on a 2nd run. I'm only human.
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Helvetica is actually slightly thinner in the Mattel example.
This misled me on the Mattel example. Could this have been a mistake be the quiz designers?
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#109Before this test I considered the differences negligible, without really knowing what the differences are. Now I consider Helvetica much more elegant and incisive.
Re: So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?
#110What I like most about Helvetica is the top of the t is flat rather than sharp and there is less stylizing overall. Arial, for me, breaks the philosophy of stylizing for stylizing sake. Helvetica, IMHO, was already perfect.
This makes me remember the Essay by Adolf Loos' Ornament and Crime (1929) (http://technical-english.wikidot.com/text-1-2). Albeit bordering on racist propaganda contains very valid points on ornamentation being wasteful which I believe was a hallmark of Dieter Rams philosophy, "Good design is as little design as possible" which highly influences Apple's industrial designer Jonathan Ive.