Earlier quoted context omitted.
Err, how about the Assange case then? Or the unrelated, completely warrantless extradition and 23-hour-a-day solitary confinement of anataka, from a third country, with absolutely no legal process?
What about the Assange case? I don't see any wrong-doing there. If there's a conspiracy going on it has nothing to do with the Swedish legal system.
Behind the scenes of the Pirate Bay trial
101–103 of 103 posts
I am terribly sorry, but I do believe that your two responses (shall we call them, perhaps, 'violent anger' and 'illogical naivete') really do only serve to further my point.
Re: Behind the scenes of the Pirate Bay trial
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about the Assange case? I don't see any wrong-doing there. If there's a conspiracy going on it has nothing to do with the Swedish legal system.
I am terribly sorry, but I do believe that your two responses (shall we call them, perhaps, 'violent anger' and 'illogical naivete') really do only serve to further my point.
FYI I've been a member of the Pirate Party since the start so I believe we're on the same "side" but that doesn't mean I agree with your conspiracy nonsense.
Re: Behind the scenes of the Pirate Bay trial
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am terribly sorry, but I do believe that your two responses (shall we call them, perhaps, 'violent anger' and 'illogical naivete') really do only serve to further my point.
FYI I've been a member of the Pirate Party since the start so I believe we're on the same "side" but that doesn't mean I agree with your conspiracy nonsense.
It's about objective breaches of both written law and higher individual freedoms. On a global basis. Facilitated by your government. Against citizens of its own and other countries. Regularly of late. To US benefit. There's no conspiracy, it's objective fact.