It can cyberattack other companies, too: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/05/tech/meta-ai-hacking
Okay, this is getting ridiculous. Were they feeling left out?
Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
101–110 of 270 posts
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#102There’s no way I’m giving Zuck any of my data.
He already has it.
One of my professors told us about the time he did a request to Facebook to send him all his data. By law they had to send it on paper. They brought it in a big truck.
All the stuff he'd deleted was still there, just with "(deleted)" next to it.
They have a lot on people without Facebook accounts though, because their tracking stuff is all over the web.
I always found it weird that Instagram gives me much better ads than Google does... Google should know much better!
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#103It can cyberattack other companies, too: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/05/tech/meta-ai-hacking
Okay, this is getting ridiculous. Were they feeling left out?
I'm feeling bad for Gemini. Their cyberattack felony count is currently 0!
Hah, someone has https://www.felonybench.com up and running now.
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#104Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#105Do they train on their own data?
I mean, when Meta's engineer is creating some new DINOv4 or Segment Anything, with all the scaffolding around it, do they train on that?
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#106They chose to compare against Open AI’s mid tier model Terra instead of Sol and still lost some benchmark against it. They left Opus in and got beat in all but one benchmark. Nothing wrong with trying to improve, but why the marketing games? Instead of trying to say in the post you’re “closer” to frontier, first set a clear goal to beat the Chinese labs on price or performance and demonstrate it convincingly. Then wh…
It could be that they’re pitching Meta Muse 1.2 against Terra and Opus level models. They probably consider Sol to be a level above, along with Fable.
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been surprised by the reception to this, as OpenAI, for a while now, has had free API usage when data sharing is enabled ( https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10306912-sharing-feedbac... )
I tried following this page, and it's certainly a lot more complex than what Meta is offering. Different price tiers, opt-in configurations, usage based availability.. I'll take the 10x discount for flipping a param switch over this all day long.
Seems pretty clear to me: enable it for the projects you want, and there’s a 1M / 10M token limit per day, depending on the model you use. Assuming an average context size of 100k tokens, that is 10 to 100 requests, which is not a lot. Reason enough to prefer actually paying for Meta as well.
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#108There’s no way I’m giving Zuck any of my data.
He already has it. One of my professors told us about the time he did a request to Facebook to send him all his data. By law they had to send it on paper. They brought it in a big truck. All the stuff he'd deleted was still there, just with "(deleted)" next to it. They have a lot on people without Facebook accounts though, because their tracking stuff is all over the web. I always found it weird that Instagram gives…
Instagram knows what content you pause on, which is a huge signal.
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#109Meta is offering a 10x discount on input ($0.10 vs. $1.25/Mtok) and 20x discount on output ($0.20 vs. $4.25/Mtok) if you opt in to let them train on your data. https://developer.meta.com/ai/models/muse-spark/
This makes it a very interesting alternative to Deepseek for personal work where I don't care about the training - judging by the AA benchmarks it seems like overall cost per task is similar to the new Deepseek Flash but with better benchmarks (and inbuilt vision capabilities).
Also looks incredibly fast. 150tps on openrouter (nearly all deepseek providers are around the 50tps mark).
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#110Why does every AI lab feel the need to build their own coding agent…? Don’t we have more than enough already?
Own the customer relationship.