Live data from Hacker News

Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]

nber.org

101–102 of 102 posts

Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]

#101
post #94
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Actually raising a child costs more than $1.2M - just $20K/year invested in S&P500 over the last 20 years would have grown to more than $1.2M. The future markets of a shrinking world, with consumer and worker cohorts dwindling year after year, will be very different from the last 20. This is paradoxal reasoning. Your're counting on going childless, while the market remains the same, other people keep having childre…

alternatively, the things can go very opposite to what you're saying as robots/AI will make many jobs more productive requiring less people thus driving the economy even more profitable than the last 20 years. The society wouldn't need those very expensive children for the jobs where robots would do.

[deleted]

Re: Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]

#102
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The men part doesn't really matter because birth rates are determined more by women's behaviors than anything else. And the paper does focus on women. Overall, the diffusion of the iPhone explains 33–52% of the decline in the general fertility rate among women aged 15–44.

Citation pls because common sense says it takes two to tango.

It requires a lot more on the woman's side to have a child, including a lower age limit. Men can't get pregnant.
Post reply on HN