Live data from Hacker News

UK to require ID or face scan before you can make social media accounts

bleepingcomputer.com

101–104 of 104 posts

Re: UK to require ID or face scan before you can make social media accounts

#101
post #77
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you the Sisyphus of goalposts or something?

I am willing to be educated; does the average schoolkid carry such a device? I suspect that the number of kids using not using an app on a device that is aware of its locality is a rounding error. Tesco* phones on some network's family plan must be 95th percentile. (* other high street retailers are available)

> I am willing to be educated; does the average schoolkid carry such a device?

Yes.

On at least Android phones, and I'm pretty sure also on iOS, location access is a user-controlled permission that's not necessarily granted to any given app. There always leaks, but are you going to require commercial software to play cat-and-mouse games to get around system security settings?

And some, possibly most, "social media" can also be used without apps.

Re: UK to require ID or face scan before you can make social media accounts

#102
post #59
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"like" It's not beyond the wit of humankind to build a working system.

I am so tired of everyone assuming the worst possible implementation of age verification. Whatever happened to steel manning? It's supposed to be in the fabric of HN. Curious enquiry. Is it nice children are exposed to dreadful things? No. Could we, with tech, come up with a way to improve things? Probably! Let's discuss and think about how!

> I am so tired of everyone assuming the worst possible implementation of age verification.

We're not assuming it. We're observing what people are in fact actually deploying.

Re: UK to require ID or face scan before you can make social media accounts

#103

This is, of course, the entire goal of the social media control for "children". And you can safely bet that this will creep from social media to essentially all content. Governments have been looking for a means to destroy the anonymous internet for years, and they're making significant progress lately.

This isn't really true. Many of the AV advocates sincerely want to "protect" children. Their idea of "protection" is in fact actively damaging on net, but they truly are obsessed with the boogeymen they keep hearing about in propaganda. Their moral panic is sincere, and more or less wipes their consciousness of any concern about collateral damange to children or adults.

There are of course also people who are in it for the universal surveillance and see the others as useful idiots, but the idiots are genuine.

Post reply on HN