Just doing random evil things for no benefit? At this point it's just wanton vandalism. Punks in suits smashing windows and setting fire to cars. Can anyone here, hand of heart, say "I agree with this decision"?
U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
101–110 of 540 posts
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#102Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because if they suddenly stop, it will quite likely have devastating repercussions for the entire globe. Weather patterns (which also effects food growing), sea life (more food), and probably some other non-food related things too!
Won’t markets adjust to that though. Market needs will lead to just-in-time innovation! If not, then victims can sue after damages incurred to recover their losses.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#104What really puts all of this into perspective for me is I work in academia and one of my friends works for a defense contractor. He told me the maintenance cost per flight hour of F-35 was a bit more than $40k, which is significantly more than I make in a year as a grad student. It's crazy basic science is what's been the focus of so many cuts while it's so cheap.
How many million graduate students do you need to give the US the military hegemony and political influence over allies and adversaries that the F-35 program provides ? Looked at from a policy maker's viewpoint, things look very different.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you think of any economically valuable reason why it might be important to know about weather trends or events in advance? Any at all?
[flagged]
People can be bad at their jobs and/or can act irrationally.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you think of any economically valuable reason why it might be important to know about weather trends or events in advance? Any at all?
[flagged]
If the data is economically valuable, mbgerring, then the private market and aligned states/charities should be the ones shouldering the costs.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
That makes no sense whatsoever. Voting for Trump (or anyone with an R by their name) is wrong; sitting out a vote is wrong. Why save all the blame for the side that actually put up resistance, however ineptly?
I think that if these sensors were providing useful, actionable information more valuable than their maintenance cost is not well supported.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#108Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#109What really puts all of this into perspective for me is I work in academia and one of my friends works for a defense contractor. He told me the maintenance cost per flight hour of F-35 was a bit more than $40k, which is significantly more than I make in a year as a grad student. It's crazy basic science is what's been the focus of so many cuts while it's so cheap.
How many million graduate students do you need to give the US the military hegemony and political influence over allies and adversaries that the F-35 program provides ? Looked at from a policy maker's viewpoint, things look very different.
The military isn't some limitless resource, and lead by incompetence, it is useless. There are no policy makers in this administration, they go on vibes and bad ones at that.
Even a guy named mad dog said that diplomacy was cheaper than bullets.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#110Climate Activist: The oceans are getting warmer & global currents are threatened by imminent collapse - we must do something!
Big Oil: Prove it!
Climate Activist: Data gathered between 2016 and 2026 shows ...
Big Oil: That's old news! Do you have more recent data?
Climate Activist: Well, no, because Trump2 dismantled the ocean observation system in 2026 ...
Big Oil: So you have no data to back up your claims?
Climate Activist: Not recent data, no, but ...
Big Oil: Case dismissed! Why should anyone take action based on subjective opinion, not backed up by hard data? For all we know the oceans could have miraculously cooled & the currents are fine!