I wonder if the motivation is to make Ai agents work better on Windows?
Coreutils for Windows
101–110 of 260 posts
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
On Windows, I've mostly avoided CRLF by configuring text editors and git to use LF, and writing text files in binary mode. The only places that still forced CRLF were batch files and clipboard.
> I've mostly avoided CRLF by configuring text editors and git to use LF, That has been my experience as well. I can't remember the last time I had an issue related to CRLF.
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#103What does this do that Cygwin doesn't?
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#104So dir is not shipped due to conflict with built-ins, echo and rmdir are shipped despite conflicts, and sort is deemed not to have a conflict? What is the logic?
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#105In the intentionally dropped section, it lists shed as "Not particularly useful on Windows." Does anyone know why? Is thre already a shred-like command in Windows?
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#106WSL2 is great, but native POSIX is even better. Of course it’s a big undertaking, but it makes Windows a first-class dev platform for those who need POSIX in production.
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#107I would have liked to see head, tail, tr, uniq, and cut. I end up dragging over the old "gnuwin32" versions of those to a lot of Windows machines. Those are my go-to tools for quick-and-dirty log analysis. I know I could use Powershell for those kinds of tasks, and I certainly do make a lot of use of Powershell, but the familiarity of those simple tools and the decades-old "muscle memory" of using them on various Uni…
The project includes all of those. Or were you talking about the past?
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#108I feel like I'm seeing an error, or I just don't understand what they mean w/ "find" and "Integrated port of the original DOS command" and not listed as conflicting. There's a "%SystemRoot%\System32\find.exe" on every Windows NT-derived OS. That's absolutely a conflict. Also, the "find" command from "findutils" is in no way functionally similar to the "original DOS command" (which is for finding text in files). Aside…
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#109Native Coreutils for Windows is genuinely some good news coming from Microsoft.
Re: Coreutils for Windows
#110A fair question is why this fork of coreutils is required when the original Rust rewrite ( https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/ ) supports Windows, in addition to Linux, macOS and wasm. The reason seems to be a few windows specific fixes ( https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/compare/main...microsoft... ) which can probably be upstreamed into the main repo.