Live data from Hacker News

What Is a Dickover?

daringfireball.net

101–110 of 227 posts

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#101
I endorse this name because, once it's the standard name for this technique, people will have to use it in meetings when seriously proposing them, which makes it harder to seriously propose.

"And this is our design for the Dickover."

"Guys, I'm not sure we should Dickover the customers."

"You know, when you say it that way...."

Epilogue: six months later, the site is dead because they converted nobody to their newsletter.

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#102

Did anyone else think this was a clever keming pun? Fortunately, for those sites where either JS is required for the content or to remove the dickover, browsers still have an Inspect Element tool that makes deleting this and other annoyances not too difficult and rather cathartic.

Safari’s “Hide Distracting Items” feature is one big reason I never use Chrome.

Don't tell anybody, but Chrome engineers managed to sneak in reader mode via Gemini.

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#103

I endorse this name because, once it's the standard name for this technique, people will have to use it in meetings when seriously proposing them, which makes it harder to seriously propose. "And this is our design for the Dickover." "Guys, I'm not sure we should Dickover the customers." "You know, when you say it that way...." Epilogue: six months later, the site is dead because they converted nobody to their newsle…

[deleted]

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Substack’s dubious practices aren’t as bad as their dubious politics. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/feb/07/revealed-how-s...

Oh yay, the nazi content again. Don't let the Feb 2026 article date fool you, this has been talked about for years and they don't lift a finger. It's like how Meta isn't incentivized to block scams because they profit off of them to the tune of a billion dollars a year. However, I do appreciate white supremacist trash outing themselves in public. Get it on the record. Some of them try to hide, but: Patriot Front had…

[flagged]

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#105
post #98

One of criteria for inclusion into Kagi Small Web [1] is no dickovers. Thanks for naming it properly John. [1] https://kagi.com/smallweb

[flagged]

Yandex is great. When you want to see news/sites/whatever that does not conform to what the western mainstream powers "accepts as acceptable", you can go to Yandex and you will find it there. When Google search went to shit some years ago I discovered Yandex and found out how much of the web was being deliberately kept away from my eyes. You need search engines from every major power broker in the world to get a full picture of what we arrogantly like to call "truth".

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#107
post #4

DO YOU CONSENT WITH OUR TRACKING COOKIES POLICY? [YES, I DO, THE IMPORTANT TRACKING ONES] [YES, I DO, ALL OF THEM] ⁿᵒ ᵃⁿᵈ ᶜˡᵒˢᵉ ᵈᶦᶜᵏᵒᵛᵉʳ

Thanks, Europe!

Well… Europe do require the accept and deny options to both be equally visible and accessible, see for example this week-old court ruling:

> Administrative Court (BVwG), thereby upholding a decision made by the Austrian Data Protection Authority in 2024. Specifically, the ORF must ensure that the buttons to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ tracking cookies are designed equally so that visitors are not tricked into agreeing.

https://noyb.eu/en/noyb-success-orfat-must-correct-misleadin...

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#109
He claims that dickovers aren't as bad as the dickbars, but I think they're equal.

The dickover is a big, immediate distraction that you can't help but deal with.

But the dickbar is insidious because you forget it's even there. You just get used to always seeing whatever banner is there and think it's just a permenant piece of the interface and you adapt to not having 25% of your viewport.

Re: What Is a Dickover?

#110
post #10

[flagged]

The author mentions a site they are paying for that still exhibits this behaviour:

> Here’s one from The Philadelphia Inquirer, for which I pay $20/month to subscribe, asking me to sign up for SMS text messages about the Jersey shore, while I’m logged into their cursed website, before they’ll let me see the article I came to read.

I would consider $20/mo "paying [...] to a sufficient degree that the ecosystem can work without the dickover".

Post reply on HN