Live data from Hacker News

LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

theregister.com

101–110 of 135 posts

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#101
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correction, we hate making money at the expense of other peoples rights and liberties. It's kind of frustrating to have to explain that to US folks over and over again... all that "freedom" in their things is apparently very decorative.

Depends on what you mean by right. Oftentimes it's rephrased as "The other guy's obligation".

Care to elaborate on that?

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#102

Wouldn't this apply to every social network? Or is this because LinkedIn shows a teaser for free and more detail for paid?

If you mean that Meta probably has a list of which users visited which other users and that they use it for internal stuff? Well, then Meta could argue they won’t tell you who visited you because they need to protect their privacy (harder for LinkedIn since they are selling that data so clearly they don’t care)

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#103
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Might be tough for a Florida-man to understand but there's a difference between being bold and being an a-hole.

Yeah, that's a very... interesting definition of "bold". One might argue that since operating inside a regulated environment is so out of his comfort zone, setting up shop in the EU would be the bold thing to do.

Maybe I’ll set up shop in the EU one day :)

Will you welcome me with open arms as long as I warn my users that my app uses cookies?

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#104
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correction, we hate making money at the expense of other peoples rights and liberties. It's kind of frustrating to have to explain that to US folks over and over again... all that "freedom" in their things is apparently very decorative.

Depends on what you mean by right. Oftentimes it's rephrased as "The other guy's obligation".

You have the obligation to not do things at the expense of others' freedoms.

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#105
post #96
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nobody's holding a gun to your head, you're welcome to setup shop in the most anarchist society you can find. Good luck with whatever version of "operating" you're able to manage while there :)

Why would I move to London?

London is safer than many american cities, what are you talking about?

edit: removed snark

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#106
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You do know that "the bureaucrats" is just a slur for our democratically elected government, right? In other words, the will of the people.

What? Of course it isn't! I mean, I guess you could argue that it's technically a slur in the sense that it is disparaging, but obviously the guy knows that he's being disparaging- you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong, and bureaucrat is not that. It also refers specifically and exclusively to the parts of the government that aren't democratically elected; the opposite…

"you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong" you are reading into this too much, slur is often used as a word for a general insult.

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#107
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Being an European doesn't make your arguments less ridiculous.

It must be rememebered that this is the forum of an American investment company. There are far too many here who would love to be the corprate boot crushing us underfood.

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#108
post #13
post #9

Oh I LOVE this, we can't have enough of these privacy-focused non-profits making tech companies' lives difficult. They have such a strong argument here, too. I can imagine that whoever came up with this is very pleased with theirselves, and rightfully so.

[flagged]

This is 100% going to be the boot lickiest comment I read all day

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#109
post #9

Oh I LOVE this, we can't have enough of these privacy-focused non-profits making tech companies' lives difficult. They have such a strong argument here, too. I can imagine that whoever came up with this is very pleased with theirselves, and rightfully so.

[flagged]

I'm european (what a vague term...) and I disagree completely. I have never seen this attitude you apparently have. I've seen lots of celebration of innovation and entrepreneurship, I've seen less appreciation for the american style "anything goes as long as the stock price goes up" business environment.

Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? Of course it isn't! I mean, I guess you could argue that it's technically a slur in the sense that it is disparaging, but obviously the guy knows that he's being disparaging- you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong, and bureaucrat is not that. It also refers specifically and exclusively to the parts of the government that aren't democratically elected; the opposite…

"you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong" you are reading into this too much, slur is often used as a word for a general insult.

Doesn't make a lot of sense to me to respond to 'I don't want to deal with their bureaucrats' with 'You do realize that's an insult, right?'. Yeah, he realizes, he is clearly trying to be insulting. It's only an insult because of that intent, in fact. A lot more sensible if the intent is to suggest that the word ought not be used because it is an insult beyond what is acceptable in polite society, which is the much more common usage of 'slur'.

Not to say it's impossible you're right that it's being brought up irrelevantly, but I do think the odds are on my side and I further think it would be worth writing a sentence calling that out even if they weren't.

Post reply on HN