Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correction, we hate making money at the expense of other peoples rights and liberties. It's kind of frustrating to have to explain that to US folks over and over again... all that "freedom" in their things is apparently very decorative.
Depends on what you mean by right. Oftentimes it's rephrased as "The other guy's obligation".
LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
101–110 of 135 posts
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#102Wouldn't this apply to every social network? Or is this because LinkedIn shows a teaser for free and more detail for paid?
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Might be tough for a Florida-man to understand but there's a difference between being bold and being an a-hole.
Yeah, that's a very... interesting definition of "bold". One might argue that since operating inside a regulated environment is so out of his comfort zone, setting up shop in the EU would be the bold thing to do.
Will you welcome me with open arms as long as I warn my users that my app uses cookies?
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correction, we hate making money at the expense of other peoples rights and liberties. It's kind of frustrating to have to explain that to US folks over and over again... all that "freedom" in their things is apparently very decorative.
Depends on what you mean by right. Oftentimes it's rephrased as "The other guy's obligation".
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nobody's holding a gun to your head, you're welcome to setup shop in the most anarchist society you can find. Good luck with whatever version of "operating" you're able to manage while there :)
Why would I move to London?
edit: removed snark
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do know that "the bureaucrats" is just a slur for our democratically elected government, right? In other words, the will of the people.
What? Of course it isn't! I mean, I guess you could argue that it's technically a slur in the sense that it is disparaging, but obviously the guy knows that he's being disparaging- you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong, and bureaucrat is not that. It also refers specifically and exclusively to the parts of the government that aren't democratically elected; the opposite…
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#107Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#108Oh I LOVE this, we can't have enough of these privacy-focused non-profits making tech companies' lives difficult. They have such a strong argument here, too. I can imagine that whoever came up with this is very pleased with theirselves, and rightfully so.
[flagged]
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#109Oh I LOVE this, we can't have enough of these privacy-focused non-profits making tech companies' lives difficult. They have such a strong argument here, too. I can imagine that whoever came up with this is very pleased with theirselves, and rightfully so.
[flagged]
Re: LinkedIn profile visitor lists belong to the people, says Noyb
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
What? Of course it isn't! I mean, I guess you could argue that it's technically a slur in the sense that it is disparaging, but obviously the guy knows that he's being disparaging- you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong, and bureaucrat is not that. It also refers specifically and exclusively to the parts of the government that aren't democratically elected; the opposite…
"you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong" you are reading into this too much, slur is often used as a word for a general insult.
Not to say it's impossible you're right that it's being brought up irrelevantly, but I do think the odds are on my side and I further think it would be worth writing a sentence calling that out even if they weren't.