Live data from Hacker News

NetHack 5.0.0

nethack.org

101–110 of 186 posts

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#101
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

** SPOILER ABOVE ** Would you please edit your comment, and preface it with a spoiler warning?

Nethack has been around since 1987, it's a little late for spoilers.

We’re in a thread about Nethack 5.0 release, I think it’s safe to say not everyone in this thread has finished the game.

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#102

And here I thought I was safe from losing months to escapism like I did in the 2000s (learned to ascend with every class though!) Anyone know why the skip over 4.x, or have any insight into how much play has changed as well as infrastructure?

Nethack4 is the name of a popular fork, they probably wanted to avoid confusing people

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#105
post #7

Aw yeah! I’d love to see somebody from the DevTeam talk about this, or literally anything else they might want to talk about, at the Roguelike Celebration in October ( https://www.roguelike.club/ ), if anyone has a connection and could encourage them to consider it. It’s a super lovely community-run online event, and everyone would be thrilled. (I was a volunteer for the first few annual events, as a person who playe…

I love Roguelike Celebration! Thanks for volunteering at it, and for boosting it here!

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#107
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nethack has been around since 1987, it's a little late for spoilers.

People still play this game. Spoilers still spoil experiences for others.

Meh, imo spoilers only spoil experiences for people who take media too seriously.

When I consider watching a movie, one of the first things I do is read a complete plot summary, including the ending. When I do this and no longer want to watch the movie, in my mind, that’s not a sign that any experience was spoiled, but rather that it just wasn’t very interesting to begin with.

Conversely, I have played Nethack on and off for decades, have read countless spoilers about it, yet still haven’t won and still find it interesting.

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#108
This is going to seem either beyond idiotic (which it may be) or a troll (which it is not) but: is this game actually fun? Like, if you have zero nostalgia or anything, and your evaluation of it is based solely on what it is, is it something a person in their 20s would want to play? Is it fun in a different way than, say, Dwarf Fortress is fun? (Haven't played DF but I think I understand why people do.)

Would really love informed takes on this.

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#109

I've been playing on and off for 15 years, sometimes daily for months on end. The deepest I managed to go is level 11, and as soon as I enter the Big Room, I die. In fact, I went past level 8 for the first time this year. I've read all of the NetHack wiki back and forth. I don't have the slightest idea what I'm doing wrong or how to improve. I'm 46 now, and if I continue that pace, I'll be dead before I even reach th…

We can only guess about what's going wrong for you specifically . But I like guessing: (extremely mild spoilers:) - A core skill for Nethack is understanding how much danger you're in at any particular moment. Your comment about soldier ants below tells me you've made good progress here. But you need to recognize when you're in danger and how long you have to deal with that problem before you'll react appropriately.…

Thank you for the tips, much appreciated!

Re: NetHack 5.0.0

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nethack has been around since 1987, it's a little late for spoilers.

We’re in a thread about Nethack 5.0 release, I think it’s safe to say not everyone in this thread has finished the game.

OP is talking about a several decade old version of nethack, not nethack 5.0.0.
Post reply on HN