Live data from Hacker News

LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

404privacy.com

101–110 of 226 posts

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#101
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought the whole point of LinkedIn was getting a job, but that would run afoul of #7. You can ignore the rest of the crap on their website.

How ever did people get jobs before recruiters? /s

Getting a job across the border is easier with LinkedIn...

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#102
post #42
post #29

Can someone here please create a LinkedIn replacement for developers that 1. Doesn't have the spam 2. That doesn't look like it's from 2008 3. That only developers / engineers / tech folks can join 4. Doesn't try to log into your email to steal your contact list 5. That doesn't track you or your extensions / browser fingerprint 6. That doesn't have a bunch of fake "linkedinmaxxing" garbage content 7. that doesn't hav…

I feel like Github became this in the last 10-15 years.

Yes. But now we need a replacement for what the old GitHub used to do.

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#104
post #29

Can someone here please create a LinkedIn replacement for developers that 1. Doesn't have the spam 2. That doesn't look like it's from 2008 3. That only developers / engineers / tech folks can join 4. Doesn't try to log into your email to steal your contact list 5. That doesn't track you or your extensions / browser fingerprint 6. That doesn't have a bunch of fake "linkedinmaxxing" garbage content 7. that doesn't hav…

LinkedIn is a cesspool, but it’s almost worthless to me without the recruiters. They’re basically the only reason I’m there.

Also a lack of LinkedIn account makes you more suspicious and less likely to get hired. So this is additional value in having an account. For appearances.

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get why people without jobs need a LinkedIn, but I don't get why they post there constantly. Like reposting stuff, writing random thoughts, posting rocket ship emojis, has anyone ever gotten a job that way?

I've heard it makes you more visible on things like search results. Linkdin, of course, is trying to encourage interaction on their site so sounds believable that they'd do that, but i've been lucky enough to not need to care.

That makes sense. I'm curious if it's proven though. Guess I'm lucky to have a job and credentials, recruiters are contacting me despite 0 public LinkedIn activity.

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#106
post #13

friends, WHEN you are asked to implement something like this at your job, which will you choose: object (& hold ground, loose job) OR comply (& keep job) as practitioners, where do we hold the line between telemetry and surveillance?

I think it's also an option to anonymously tell the world what will happen. That way you keep your job and still people are at least aware. Unless if you are one of like 3 people who know about it and they would immediately know it was you.

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#108
post #73
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want it to happen, we should talk requirements - what would you want from a LinkedIn NextGen? - A professional profile page - Contacts - Introductions/referrals - Ask my (sub-)network? Anything else?

A way for you to make money that isn’t ads / harvesting my data. Exportable format so I can leave if needed.

You want the unemployed to pay? Or do you want the employers to pay? If you want the employers to pay, how do you attract enough attractive unemployed to your site?

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#109
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like Github became this in the last 10-15 years.

Yes. But now we need a replacement for what the old GitHub used to do.

You need a new type of corporation.

Only a Public Benefit Corporation will get the software to a usable state and refuse enshittification

Re: LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions

#110
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn’t exactly. They created a list of known extensions by their id and a file which is known to exist in that extension. The site iterates over each pair and tries to load that file, if it doesn’t error it knows the extension is installed. It’s a clever and difficult manual process, but it does bypass the security trying to prevent this kind of thing. I read that their reasoning is it exists to block users that us…

So the follow up question, is why is a random website, allowed to try and load arbitrary files?

Because extensions can and often do contain stuff like images or JS bundles that they inject into a target page's DOM. Not allowing a tab's context to load files from the chrome-extension:// namespace would break a lot of things.
Post reply on HN