Claude.ai down
101–110 of 138 posts
Re: Claude.ai down
#102It's strange to think how dependent people have become on these tools to the point where they can't function until they're back to normal.
I had some mundane refactoring work that I would have happily led Claude handle this morning. I shrugged and did it myself and it was fine. If a team is so dependent on Claude that they’re paralyzed when it goes down, I’d worry that they’re in over their heads. Opus 4.6 is amazing but still has limits. You need to know what you’re looking at and how to send it in the right direction, as well as when to reject its out…
Re: Claude.ai down
#103I wonder how long it will take the software industry to re-learn the 2010s lesson, that basing your entire business on (and in this case, firing half of your employees and replacing them with) another company’s API is a bad business decision
Is it important to be that self reliant? I wasn't in the workforce then, so I assume if you have an outsourced system with 99% reliability it would be an acceptable risk. Not sure if any AI system will reach that level, but for potential gains it could be worth it.
Re: Claude.ai down
#104I got 2 500s and quickly popped over to codex since I was just doing documentation and planning work and didn't neeeeeeed claude. He's already back for me. :) To another's point, yeah, it's sad that Claude taking a brief hiatus just halts workflow. I imagine my whole team just started packing for a beach trip. Then again, I suppose if the CPA office computers go down, everyone doesn't dust off giant ledgers and quill…
I want to like Claude but I keep having to pop over to codex and I feel at some point I'll stop starting with Claude and just use Codex from the start.
If you create a plan it follows it closely
Re: Claude.ai down
#105Re: Claude.ai down
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you say it is a bad business decision? It seems to be a fine decision to make for things like AWS, since when it goes down, a ton of websites go down and no one blames the site. There is no way to know whether it is a good or bad business decision just because they can go down when a third party goes down. For example, if you save $50 million a year by firing half your employees and replacing them with AI,…
On the other hand a competitor site that is up (or bricks and mortar competitors) might get a lot of business when AWS goes down. If you depend on AWS for operations it might be a lot more expensive than that. Mostly I think its that management does not blame the person who picks AWS. Its another iteration of "no one got fired for buying IBM/Microsoft". It is also an issue at other levels: if all a county's businesse…
Re: Claude.ai down
#107I wonder how long it will take the software industry to re-learn the 2010s lesson, that basing your entire business on (and in this case, firing half of your employees and replacing them with) another company’s API is a bad business decision
Frontier models being in the hands of a handful companies does not help either. Let's hope that the open weight movement changes that soon.
Re: Claude.ai down
#108It's strange to think how dependent people have become on these tools to the point where they can't function until they're back to normal.
I'm doing the work of an entire team now. I can still do the work of one person by hand, but that's not acceptable anymore.
Re: Claude.ai down
#109I wonder how long it will take the software industry to re-learn the 2010s lesson, that basing your entire business on (and in this case, firing half of your employees and replacing them with) another company’s API is a bad business decision
Frontier models being in the hands of a handful companies does not help either. Let's hope that the open weight movement changes that soon.
Re: Claude.ai down
#110It's strange to think how dependent people have become on these tools to the point where they can't function until they're back to normal.
I am pretty sure most people deep in AI tool use various LLM providers anyway.