101–110 of 196 posts
I actually quite enjoy the OpenClaw. Although the recent CC crackdown has caused me to try different LLM providers which aren't that reliable but anyways, here are few things I do with it, in all separate groups. * Telegram Health Group, created an agent to help me track sleep, recommend my supplements based on my location, remind me in the morning and evening to monitor my food. I send it images of what I eat and it…
I'm using openclaw as a personal development bot, which is pretty useful. It pings me throughout the day using crons to complete tasks and follows up on them. But aside from that, it is a very unreliable piece of software. I'm constantly having to fix it, or track down correct configurations. It can just decide to randomly edit it's own config, uses incorrect json keys and then the whole thing is dead. Or it blows th…
But it’s so terribly unstable, it’s as if nobody actually tests things before pushing a release. I don’t need 2 updates per day, I just need one every few weeks that’s stable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Status quo influences how good your proof has to be (extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence) but not who needs to bring it.
Think more deeply about this. https://lastedenblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/13/professor-jame...
And then it ends with that sudden left turn into denouncing atheists as inherently irrational and evil. WTF?
Congratulations on bringing an argument so terrible that I’m actually more convinced of my position after having read it than I was before.
From my perspective there are some people that have never built real processes in their life that enjoy having some processes now. But agent processes are less reliable slower and less maintenable then a process that is well-defined and architectured and uses llm’s only where no other solution is sufficient. Classification, drafting, summarizing. I’ve had a Whatsapp assistant since 2023, jailbraked as easy assistant.…
You probably don't know how to setup memory. The killer usecase is letting you make whatever you want, instead of being at the mercy of what your OS/platform dictates. Your idea of a killer idea is a whatsapp summarizer lol.
From my perspective there are some people that have never built real processes in their life that enjoy having some processes now. But agent processes are less reliable slower and less maintenable then a process that is well-defined and architectured and uses llm’s only where no other solution is sufficient. Classification, drafting, summarizing. I’ve had a Whatsapp assistant since 2023, jailbraked as easy assistant.…
Fully agree with your comment regarding real processes. Being a Six Sigma Black Belt, studying processes and reducing the errors is critical. The Openclaw processes at the moment scare me.
I'm using openclaw as a personal development bot, which is pretty useful. It pings me throughout the day using crons to complete tasks and follows up on them. But aside from that, it is a very unreliable piece of software. I'm constantly having to fix it, or track down correct configurations. It can just decide to randomly edit it's own config, uses incorrect json keys and then the whole thing is dead. Or it blows th…
It's not as fun with SOUL.md etc but so far much less janky.
From my perspective there are some people that have never built real processes in their life that enjoy having some processes now. But agent processes are less reliable slower and less maintenable then a process that is well-defined and architectured and uses llm’s only where no other solution is sufficient. Classification, drafting, summarizing. I’ve had a Whatsapp assistant since 2023, jailbraked as easy assistant.…
This. So many junior engineers showing me AI flows that could just be a script with a few parameter inputs
But there's still value in people exploring new spaces they find interesting, even if they do not meet your personal definition of pareto-optimal.
It would’ve happened eventually anyway, but OpenClaw is basically what kickstarted the beginning of the end of token subsidies. It’s a almost begging to be used wastefully. And agents would miss and lose nothing without it. It’s devoid of a reason to exist.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Think more deeply about this. https://lastedenblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/13/professor-jame...
What a bizarre article. The morality of recreational torture is not a matter of factual correctness. Burden of proof is not a concept that makes any sense when there’s a disagreement over morality. You can make arguments for your position and those arguments may involve factual claims which can be proven or disproven, but the underlying morality can’t. And then it ends with that sudden left turn into denouncing athei…