Earlier quoted context omitted.
This analogy is stupid at best, profoundly ignorant at worst. No it isn't. If you could explain why you would have already. Saying that some dependencies aren't heavy so the problem isn't dependencies doesn't make any sense. Huge bloated binaries are from lots of bloated dependencies because people aren't actually writing 50 MB of stuff to do what they need.
> If you could explain why you have already. I have my suspicions. But I rather speak with certainty rather than spout unfounded hypotheses as facts. > Saying that some dependencies aren't heavy so the problem isn't dependencies doesn't make sense. If I did say that. I said that isn't necessarily dependencies, because you have yet to prove it. If you do prove it, then that is that. As of now, all you've shown is that…
Not a single data structure, that's for sure. Have you ever programmed before?