[flagged]
Claude Managed Agents
101–109 of 109 posts
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
@jawiggins saw your repo it looks like openAI symphony but better as it works across multiple agents and issue trackers and the feedback loop is great . One feature request though - can you add plan mode ? Your issues are so detailed it becomes plan to implement (but I guess your plan mode is currently happening outside of GitHub issues ) but let’s say issue is “implement support for plan mode” there should be back a…
Thanks for the feedback. Earlier I expected I'd need to do more back and forth with the agents before accepting their work but in general I've found it isn't needed. I do have some features coming up that will improve the ability to converse with the agent as it's running. I'll make a note to add in a plan setting so you can have that run and converse before it gets going.
Thanks for considering it. So how are you doing it now ? Who is generating the plan inside of issue ex: https://github.com/jonwiggins/optio/issues/418
Do you just add the Issue Title like this "feat: CLI improvements — status dashboard, workflow commands, shell completions" and it generated the plan in issue body and started working on it OR is the plan generated by another ai agent and copied to issue body for pickup by optio ?
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#103[flagged]
[flagged]
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#104I am wondering if this is (or what else will be) the last piece of software + infra that's needed to "automate it all" and have non-technical people build, run, and maintain it? To me the all this agentic workflow automation is headed that way. Am I missing something?
[deleted]
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe framework is simply never, ever going to work for LLM-based agentic workflows. Framework is simply way too rigid for a non-deterministic technology. We may see libraries that provide tools for managing agents, but then again, there's nothing that tmux can't do already.
I'm a bit at odds with this. I agree a framework is something that sounds outdated. I also believe an orchestrator is needed. Something that abstracts you from a specific provider. Like hardware, drivers and operating systems. Right now, my thoughts are on that line: Who will build that operating system? Who will have it in the cloud? It needs to be robust to operate for large organizations, open source, and sit on t…
necro-posting here, but that's kinda what we're working on! We're focused on creating cloud workspaces for sandboxed coding agents and it's built to support any agent harness. https://www.amika.dev/
Under the hood, we're open sourcing a lot of the parts for provisioning these agents, their VMs/sandboxes, and managing agent messaging + sessions. Put our open source plans here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vevSJsSCWT_reuD7JwAuGCX5...
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably never. There are a couple reasons: 1. We pay for saas, so we don't have to manage it. If you vibe-code or use these AI things, then you are managing it yourself. 2. Most Saas is like $20-$100/month/person for most Saas. For a software engineer, that maybe 3. Most Saas require some sort of human in the loop to check for quality (at least sampling). No users would want to do that. Number 2 is the biggest reaso…
Interesting, so you're saying Anthropic/Openai/etc will get a general solution that won't be hands off. The moat for other companies will be creating the specific, managed solution. I can see that, assuming models don't make some giant leap forward.
[deleted]
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably never. There are a couple reasons: 1. We pay for saas, so we don't have to manage it. If you vibe-code or use these AI things, then you are managing it yourself. 2. Most Saas is like $20-$100/month/person for most Saas. For a software engineer, that maybe 3. Most Saas require some sort of human in the loop to check for quality (at least sampling). No users would want to do that. Number 2 is the biggest reaso…
Interesting, so you're saying Anthropic/Openai/etc will get a general solution that won't be hands off. The moat for other companies will be creating the specific, managed solution. I can see that, assuming models don't make some giant leap forward.
[flagged]
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
i get paid in vibes and chilling as well for some similar agent stuff i do for content creators. quick question, how do you manage these side projects that kinda need to be production ready but aren't you are actual SF job lol? some of these people think they are my actual customer/client but like i do it for fun and to help them out.
As a video content creator, I'm curious if you would mind sharing the agentic stuff you're doing for others?
not necessarly agentic
i use comfyui to generate cartoons for some comedians
i also have an n8n pipeline (there is an agent here) that mines social media for certain topics and audio
i also use gemini to transcribe audio from sets and to generate scripts
i am working on a clipmaker because I find opus pro and others to leave out context and audience reactions too often.. i will just upscale in topaz anyways.
Re: Claude Managed Agents
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a video content creator, I'm curious if you would mind sharing the agentic stuff you're doing for others?
not necessarly agentic i use comfyui to generate cartoons for some comedians i also have an n8n pipeline (there is an agent here) that mines social media for certain topics and audio i also use gemini to transcribe audio from sets and to generate scripts i am working on a clipmaker because I find opus pro and others to leave out context and audience reactions too often.. i will just upscale in topaz anyways.
I've used Opus a few times and always found it lacking as well. I'd be interested in a clip maker that doesn't miss context.