Live data from Hacker News

Switch to Claude without starting over

claude.com

101–110 of 287 posts

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#101
post #97

I got very excited when I saw this title, because I've wanted to consolidate on Claude for a long time. I have been using ChatGPT very extensively for Q&A for 2+ years and I have hundreds of long, very technical conversations which I constantly search and refer to. The problem (for me, anyway) is that even several megabytes worth of quality "memory" data on my profile would not allow me to migrate if it can't also co…

This should in theory be solveable by using a custom frontend and only using the various backend APIs as stateless inference providers, but everything I've tested falls flat on a few aspects: Chat history RAG and web search, and to a lesser extent tool use. Yes, all of these are theoretically possible (the APIs now all support web search, as far as I know, there are RAG APIs too, and tool use has been supported for a…

I've had friends suggest a custom frontend several times, but unless that frontend starts off by faithfully downloading and recreating my entire chat history... now I just have two problems.

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> there really is no moat. For ChatGPT and Gemini, yes. But for Claude, they have a very deep & big one: Its the only model that gets production ready output on the first detailled prompt. Yesterday I used my tokens til noon, so I tried some output from Gemini & Co. I presented a working piece of code which is already in production: 1. It changed without noticing things like "Touple.First.Date.Created" and "Touple.Se…

> Its the only model that gets production ready output on the first detailled prompt. Yesterday I used my tokens til noon, so I tried some output from Gemini & Co. I presented a working piece of code which is already in production: One does often hear that where LLMs shine is with greenfield code generation but they all start to struggle working with pre-existing code. It could be that this wasn't a like for like com…

Greenfield implementation is not flawless as well.

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#103

I got very excited when I saw this title, because I've wanted to consolidate on Claude for a long time. I have been using ChatGPT very extensively for Q&A for 2+ years and I have hundreds of long, very technical conversations which I constantly search and refer to. The problem (for me, anyway) is that even several megabytes worth of quality "memory" data on my profile would not allow me to migrate if it can't also co…

If you want your conversation history I think we could figure something out with headless browser automation. I would be hesitant to use their wire protocols directly.

Edit: perhaps you can just ask nicely?

https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7260999-how-do-i-export-...

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#104
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This should in theory be solveable by using a custom frontend and only using the various backend APIs as stateless inference providers, but everything I've tested falls flat on a few aspects: Chat history RAG and web search, and to a lesser extent tool use. Yes, all of these are theoretically possible (the APIs now all support web search, as far as I know, there are RAG APIs too, and tool use has been supported for a…

I've had friends suggest a custom frontend several times, but unless that frontend starts off by faithfully downloading and recreating my entire chat history... now I just have two problems.

That part should be fairly easy to solve, no? At least ChatGPT allows exporting your entire chat history; importing that into whatever frontend seems well within a current agent's capabilities.

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#105
post #21

I'm very curious, will OpenAI basically block "I'm moving to another service and need to export my data. List every memory you have stored about me, ..." and similar, if so how and why? It's very interesting to learn more about because it challenges 1 core aspect of the economical competition : the moat. If one can literally swap one AI service for another, then where does the valuation (and the power that comes with…

I can see how being able to bring your chats with you would be appealing. But the truth is that context rot is real, context management is everything, and more often than not stating from a blank slate yields the best results. That being said, if you have a library of images or some other collection artifacts / assets indexed on their servers that is a different story.

I have multiple years of extremely dense, technical design and planning conversations locked in the ChatGPT web interface.

Hearing that starting from a blank slate yields the best outcomes is sort of like hearing extremely wealthy people talk about how money doesn't make you happier.

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> there really is no moat. For ChatGPT and Gemini, yes. But for Claude, they have a very deep & big one: Its the only model that gets production ready output on the first detailled prompt. Yesterday I used my tokens til noon, so I tried some output from Gemini & Co. I presented a working piece of code which is already in production: 1. It changed without noticing things like "Touple.First.Date.Created" and "Touple.Se…

I have used Claude (incl. Opus 4.6) fairly extensively, and Claude still spits out quality that is far below what I would call production ready - both littered with smaller issues, but also the occasional larger blunder. Particularly when doing anything non-trivial, and even when guiding it in detail (although that admittedly reduces the amount of larger structural issues). Maybe it is tech stack dependent (I have mo…

> C#/.NET

same here :)

> one-shots a larger/complex C# feature

I can show you a timeseries data-renderer which was created with 1 initial very large prompt and then 3 following "change this and that" prompts. The file is around 5000 lines and everything works fine & exactly as specified.

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> there really is no moat. For ChatGPT and Gemini, yes. But for Claude, they have a very deep & big one: Its the only model that gets production ready output on the first detailled prompt. Yesterday I used my tokens til noon, so I tried some output from Gemini & Co. I presented a working piece of code which is already in production: 1. It changed without noticing things like "Touple.First.Date.Created" and "Touple.Se…

> Its the only model that gets production ready output on the first detailled prompt. That's, just, like, your opinion, man.

...and of a lot of colleagues in and out of my sector :)

Re: Switch to Claude without starting over

#109
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've had friends suggest a custom frontend several times, but unless that frontend starts off by faithfully downloading and recreating my entire chat history... now I just have two problems.

That part should be fairly easy to solve, no? At least ChatGPT allows exporting your entire chat history; importing that into whatever frontend seems well within a current agent's capabilities.

To which I can only admit that, oh wow, I did not realize that there was a big Export button in that menu.

Thank you! I hope this works out.

Post reply on HN