Live data from Hacker News

A simple web we own

rsdoiel.github.io

101–110 of 240 posts

Re: A simple web we own

#101
post #72

As someone who is roughly in the same age group as the author and who was running a BBS, has witnessed the rise of IP4 networks, HTTP, Mosaic etc. let me provide a counter-point. The democratization ends at your router. Unless you are willing to lay down your own wires - which for legal reasons you most likely won't be able to do, we will hopelessly be dependent on the ISP. (Radio on free frequencies is possible and…

[deleted]

Re: A simple web we own

#105
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> supply tooling similar to Word just fyi, Word still has Save As -> Web Page (.htm). For a blog post or newsletter type thing i bet it works just fine.

I wonder if some part of the FrontPage [0] codebase lives on in there... [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_FrontPage

https://openlivewriter.com/ lives on

Re: A simple web we own

#106
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kumbaya is never a motivator. Now, self-interest, on the other hand...

Spot the American. Capitalism is not the only way of life, and FYGM is a mental illness outside of the US

What is you preferred socioeconomic system? Any countries successfully implementing it so we can copy them?

Re: A simple web we own

#107
post #72

As someone who is roughly in the same age group as the author and who was running a BBS, has witnessed the rise of IP4 networks, HTTP, Mosaic etc. let me provide a counter-point. The democratization ends at your router. Unless you are willing to lay down your own wires - which for legal reasons you most likely won't be able to do, we will hopelessly be dependent on the ISP. (Radio on free frequencies is possible and…

> there's no hope of getting a world-wide, free, uncensored, unlimited IP4/6 network back.

What do you mean "back"? It was never free, as in zero-cost. It was also not very unlimited; I remember times when I had to pay not only for the modem time online, but also for the kilobytes transferred. Uncensored, yes, because basically nobody cared, and the number of users was relatively minuscule.

The utopia was never in the past, and it remains in the future. I still think that staying irrelevant for large crowds and big money is key.

Re: A simple web we own

#108
post #107
post #72

As someone who is roughly in the same age group as the author and who was running a BBS, has witnessed the rise of IP4 networks, HTTP, Mosaic etc. let me provide a counter-point. The democratization ends at your router. Unless you are willing to lay down your own wires - which for legal reasons you most likely won't be able to do, we will hopelessly be dependent on the ISP. (Radio on free frequencies is possible and…

> there's no hope of getting a world-wide, free, uncensored, unlimited IP4/6 network back. What do you mean "back"? It was never free, as in zero-cost. It was also not very unlimited; I remember times when I had to pay not only for the modem time online, but also for the kilobytes transferred. Uncensored, yes, because basically nobody cared, and the number of users was relatively minuscule. The utopia was never in th…

he literally said "we never had it in the first place"

Re: A simple web we own

#109
post #72

As someone who is roughly in the same age group as the author and who was running a BBS, has witnessed the rise of IP4 networks, HTTP, Mosaic etc. let me provide a counter-point. The democratization ends at your router. Unless you are willing to lay down your own wires - which for legal reasons you most likely won't be able to do, we will hopelessly be dependent on the ISP. (Radio on free frequencies is possible and…

To be fair with fibre to the home rolling out in more and more places upstream speeds are improving.

The upstream bandwidth sure improved but ISPs are still hostile to self-hosting by limiting ports, resetting connections every x days and not providing an ipv4 for a reasonable charge.

Re: A simple web we own

#110

I am in the process of co-founding a new protocol which creates a decentralized root of trust using normal plain-text names (i.e. `foo.bar`). One of the goals I hope to obtain is allowing domain-style lookups of private websites hosted on P2P networks. It's lofty, but the dialog used by OP is _very_ close to why I think it's necessary.

Have you considered improving ygddrasil or something similar.
Post reply on HN