Live data from Hacker News

Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

theintercept.com

101–110 of 388 posts

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#102
post #17

What are some ways users can insulate themselves from something like this?

As a rule: don't bother with trying to "opt out" of data collection. Reject the collection entirely either by forcefully blocking it (ublock Origin for instance) or straight up not using the service.

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#103

Remember "Don't be evil"? It's crazy anyone would trust a corporation with anything these days.

It's crazy that "corporations = bad" passes as insightful comment on HN these days.

I don't think it's as simple as "corps. = bad". It's more that naive slogans like "don't be evil" used to be taken seriously. Companies exist to make money. This is ok! It generally works well in a capitalistic system. But to expect more than that people are realizing is a pipe dream... which is why you need good rules in place (i.e., regulations, laws) to direct companies and their behaviors.

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#104
post #17

What are some ways users can insulate themselves from something like this?

Don't use products from large US tech companies? Apple has a slightly better track record than Google of fighting this stuff, but ultimately if you're using a product from a US tech company then it's likely ICE can get their grubby little mitts on everything that company knows about you

> Don't use products from large US tech companies?

What does large have to do with it? Why do you think smaller companies are any more likely to resist? If anything, they have even less resources to go to court.

And why do you think other countries are any better? If you use a French provider, and they get a French judicial requisition or letters rogatory, then do you think the outcome is going to be any different?

I mean sure if you're avoiding ICE specifically, then using anything non-American is a start. But similarly, in you're in France and want to protect yourself, then using products from American companies without a presence in France is similarly a good strategy.

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#105
Google discloses stats about government requests via FISA / National Security Letters: https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/us-national-...

I was in one of these published NSLs issued by FBI a few years ago. I was notified by Google after the nondisclosure period.

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#106

Remember "Don't be evil"? It's crazy anyone would trust a corporation with anything these days.

It's crazy that "corporations = bad" passes as insightful comment on HN these days.

Not really. HN had its Eternal September moment years ago.

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#107
post #79

So I don't think I actually have a problem with businesses handing over their customer data if there is a valid warrant or subpoena. That's the system working as intended. The main crux of the problem here is that the DHS has been granted a wide berth by congress to issue administrative subpoenas - i.e. not reviewed by a real judge and not directed at criminals. In "good" times this made investigations run smoothly.…

> In "good" times this made investigations run smoothly. These times never existed.

Isn't that why the scare quotes are there?

Re: Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number

#110

So I don't think I actually have a problem with businesses handing over their customer data if there is a valid warrant or subpoena. That's the system working as intended. The main crux of the problem here is that the DHS has been granted a wide berth by congress to issue administrative subpoenas - i.e. not reviewed by a real judge and not directed at criminals. In "good" times this made investigations run smoothly.…

I don't see how what has been described here as "the system works as intended".

A free state should not be able to sniff after people for made up reasons.

Post reply on HN