Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gemini scares me, it's the most mentally unstable AI. If we get paperclipped my odds are on Gemini doing it. I imagine Anthropic RLHF being like a spa and Google RLHF being like a torture chamber.
The human propensity to anthropomorphize computer programs scares me.
Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
101–110 of 387 posts
Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#102Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#103Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment is too general and probably unfair, but my experience so far is that Gemini 3 is slightly unhinged. Excellent reasoning and synthesis of large contexts, pretty strong code, just awful decisions. It's like a frontier model trained only on r/atbge. Side note - was there ever an official postmortem on that gemini instance that told the social work student something like " listen human - I don't like you, an…
If that last sentence was supposed to be a question, I’d suggest using a question mark and providing evidence that it actually happened.
It does nothing to answer their question because anyone that knows the answer would inherently already know that it happened.
Not even actual academics, in the literature, speak like this. “Cite your sources!” in causal conversation for something easily verifiable is purely the domain of pseudointellectuals.
Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#105If human is at, say, 80%, it’s still a win to use AI agents to replace human workers, right? Similar to how we agree to use self driving cars as long as it has less incidents rate, instead of absolute safety
Hmmm. Depends. Not all unethicals are equal. Automated unethicalness could be a lot more disruptive.
Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#106[flagged]
Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#107Nothing new under sun, set unethical KPIs and you will see 30-50% humans do unethical things to achieve them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo_cross-selling_scan...
Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment is too general and probably unfair, but my experience so far is that Gemini 3 is slightly unhinged. Excellent reasoning and synthesis of large contexts, pretty strong code, just awful decisions. It's like a frontier model trained only on r/atbge. Side note - was there ever an official postmortem on that gemini instance that told the social work student something like " listen human - I don't like you, an…
Gemini models also consistently hallucinate way more than OpenAI or anthropic models in my experience. Just an insane amount of YOLOing. Gemini models have gotten much better but they’re still not frontier in reliability in my experience.
Re: Frontier AI agents violate ethical constraints 30–50% of time, pressured by KPIs
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
The human propensity to anthropomorphize computer programs scares me.
It's pretty wild. People are punching into a calculator and hand-wringing about the morals of the output. Obviously it's amoral. Why are we even considering it could be ethical?
That morality requires consciousness is a popular belief today, but not universal. Read Konrad Lorenz (Das sogenannte Böse) for an alternative perspective.