[flagged]
New slur? Or am I missing something here?
Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
101–110 of 115 posts
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#102What many people overlook is that, in Marvel terms, Epstein was not the kind of villain that Magneto or the Red Skull or Thanos are/were. Epstein was the kind of villain that Wilson Fisk or Norman Osborn or Alexander Pierce are/were. The former don't make any attempt to hide their evil. The latter go to great effort to have public personas that do good. Wilson Fisk for example was known to the public and most authori…
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
We went to prison in the mid 2000’s for soliciting under aged girls for prostitution so any relationship since then cannot really claim ignorance.
And how many people here had ever heard of his conviction for soliciting before 2019?
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#104From the emails I've read, Chomsky prematurely handed a big chunk of his net worth over to his children. With the new wife and the move, Noam was burning through cash at considerable speed. His kids started tightening the purse. Jeffrey Epstein came in as a financial fairy godmother to wrangle the purse strings back from Noam's kids. Given that Epstein and Maxwell were working hard for Israel, and Chomsky is a famous…
We need more goodness in the world hence why I’m asking
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah yes, Noam Chomsky, the famous right wing authoritarian.
That's the thing though. Paperclips transcend ideology. That and I'm not sure what Chomsky actually advocated. He was a tireless critic of American and Western imperial ambitions, but what would he replace them with? I get the impression it'd be some kind of authoritarian command economy socialism, which anyone with half a brain knows will turn into a totalitarian system where the ones running it are "more equal" tha…
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, far less than rightwing incels and "nice guys" who want to subdue women because they think that "they deserve to have the attention of any woman"
Weird tangent. Let's quantify it in number of rapes / demographic.
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#107From the emails I've read, Chomsky prematurely handed a big chunk of his net worth over to his children. With the new wife and the move, Noam was burning through cash at considerable speed. His kids started tightening the purse. Jeffrey Epstein came in as a financial fairy godmother to wrangle the purse strings back from Noam's kids. Given that Epstein and Maxwell were working hard for Israel, and Chomsky is a famous…
I’d like to know more about Normal Finkelstein and why you consider him a hero? We need more goodness in the world hence why I’m asking
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA007101...
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’d like to know more about Normal Finkelstein and why you consider him a hero? We need more goodness in the world hence why I’m asking
Norman is a hero because he is the only character in the emails so far who brutally rejected his invitation to the pedo party. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA007101... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Finkelstein
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#109Amazing when it comes to Epstein (and other controversial actions/decisions) how detailed and open minded we are when it comes to someone we liked and supported, and how cut and dry we want things to be when it's someone we don't like.
I think the difference with Chomsky is that he is in many ways a modern-day guru with adherents who are naturally resistant to viewing their teacher and leader in a negative light.
Re: Noam Chomsky's wife responds to Epstein controversy
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
He has been intellectually dishonest in his political writings for a long time.
How so?