Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

biometricupdate.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

101–110 of 412 posts

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#101

Post by elnatro »

frumplestlatz wrote: post #92
viraptor wrote: post #55

Since there's quite a few people here working at US companies with access to lots of user data, but they may not have decision making capacity, I just thought I'll link the Simple Sabotage Field Manual, out of context and for no reason at all https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/... If some data is shared with an external entity, it likely needs to be included in a few usual disclaimers, with a…

[flagged]

Please, enlighten me a non-American, what laws allow shooting and killing civilians on broad light on the USA?

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#102

Post by yanhangyhy »

It is really hard to understand that this is a country that our nation’s media and KOLs have vigorously whitewashed for decades. They say the United States protects private property, that America is free and democratic, and that everyone owns guns, so they can guarantee their own freedom.

All of our people should feel ashamed of this—being deceived by the media day after day for decades. Too stupid. Even today, there are still many people who firmly believe it.

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#103

Post by mindslight »

frumplestlatz wrote: post #92
viraptor wrote: post #55

Since there's quite a few people here working at US companies with access to lots of user data, but they may not have decision making capacity, I just thought I'll link the Simple Sabotage Field Manual, out of context and for no reason at all https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/... If some data is shared with an external entity, it likely needs to be included in a few usual disclaimers, with a…

[flagged]

And yet many more of us care about the centuries-old laws that ICE is violating.

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#104

Post by habinero »

j-pb wrote: post #73
learingsci wrote: post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

German here, with little stakes in your shitshow. At no point during the obama years did I think: "Wow this looks just like the rise of the nazis!" Which was covered extensively during my history classes. Why did you even have all the school schootings if you don't use that stupid second ammendmend thing you have? This is the tyranical government you've all been waiting for.

You can really tell which states actually fund their education programs by who understands this and who does not.

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#105

Post by golem14 »

cess11 wrote: post #81
fauchletenerum wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a childishly simplistic view of the world

What complexity is it you'd like to add?

For instance, the local cops checking in on grandma, or those checking in on a troubled child are really not the bad guys. You WANT them when you need them.

Not all LEOs are brown shirts, In my experience, few are, but they give the lot a bad rap.

Treating LEOs uniformly as evil is just counterproductive

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#106

Post by jamboca »

frumplestlatz wrote: post #92
viraptor wrote: post #55

Since there's quite a few people here working at US companies with access to lots of user data, but they may not have decision making capacity, I just thought I'll link the Simple Sabotage Field Manual, out of context and for no reason at all https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/... If some data is shared with an external entity, it likely needs to be included in a few usual disclaimers, with a…

[flagged]

i want to comment something violently hateful towards you. but at this point I feel bad for people like you. indeed you are already living out some twisted arc of the karmic cycle which results in your life and making this comment. i hope you find help eventually and i wish peace for you.

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#107

Post by Paracompact »

elnatro wrote: post #101
frumplestlatz wrote: post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Please, enlighten me a non-American, what laws allow shooting and killing civilians on broad light on the USA?

Some people have absolutist takes on these sorts of things. If the stated purpose makes sense ("stop illegal immigration"), they will dismiss tragedies as routine accidents of an imperfect world. If they have no sense of when exceptions become intolerable and course-correction becomes necessary, then by definition, no amount of evidence will change their mind.

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#108

Post by runsWphotons »

elnatro wrote: post #101
frumplestlatz wrote: post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Please, enlighten me a non-American, what laws allow shooting and killing civilians on broad light on the USA?

When an officer has reasonable suspicion that a civilian poses a threat to his life, he can shoot them. Once police start shooting they are trained to continue shooting until the target is incapacitated. That's the law. Whether the recent shootings you saw meet that standard is up for debate.

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#109

Post by _DeadFred_ »

frumplestlatz wrote: post #92
viraptor wrote: post #55

Since there's quite a few people here working at US companies with access to lots of user data, but they may not have decision making capacity, I just thought I'll link the Simple Sabotage Field Manual, out of context and for no reason at all https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/... If some data is shared with an external entity, it likely needs to be included in a few usual disclaimers, with a…

[flagged]

Is that the 'police don't need to identify themselves and should wear face masks' or the 'you aren't allowed to film the police because it interferes with our trying to be a secret police force' laws?

Or the 'you aren't doing anything illegal but the masked government agents don't like it so they are going to use your biometrics to harass you in whatever ways the feds can make your life more difficult' laws?

Re: ICE seeks industry input on ad tech location data for investigative use

#110

Post by CalRobert »

SpicyLemonZest wrote: post #54
tokyobreakfast wrote: post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The call is coming from inside the house.

As effective calls to action often do! It's almost tautological when I say it this way, but if you want people working in ad tech to oppose ICE you have to convince them it's good for people working in ad tech to oppose ICE. Perhaps the conflict is that you just want to make people who work in ad tech feel bad, and don't care whether or not they enable ICE? That's fine, I suppose, there's industries I feel the same w…

That’s the voice part of exit, loyalty, voice is it not?
Post reply on HN