It would be Musk automating CSAM. This is how we're starting 2026?
The article doesn't mention CSAM. It is about "created sexualized images of people including minors" and CSAM is not that.
Grok Sexual Images Draw Rebuke, France Flags Content as Illegal
101–103 of 103 posts
Re: Grok Sexual Images Draw Rebuke, France Flags Content as Illegal
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then maybe they shouldn't go to market.
AI is a nation defense issue. No nation has the luxury to stop their AI companies without the risk of losing national sovereignty.
I'm 90% sure LLMs are, just from how important code is, but image generators? Nah. They're as relevant to national sovereignty as having a local film industry: more than zero, because money is fungible, but still really really low.
Re: Grok Sexual Images Draw Rebuke, France Flags Content as Illegal
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Removing people's clothes without their consent is assault, it doesn't matter if, in another setting, where they did consent to it , it would be fine. It obviously is sexual if you look at the intent of people doing it. Not the clothing itself.
> Removing people's clothes without their consent is assault Didn't you know? Grok does not actually remove people's clothes. Instead it pastes from photos of /other people who are already naked/.
It makes it look realistic with their likeness and body shape though, so it's not merely "pasting" from photos of other people. And quite honestly I find it morally objectionable to have a tool that makes violating consent and bodily autonomy so trivial. Filters exist, they should be used. It's nothing like photoshop. It runs on their servers, using their software, and then is uploaded, by them, onto their website. Yeah I definitely hold X and grok accountable for the harm it causes. It's nothing like offline software.