Live data from Hacker News

Meta's ads tools started switching out top-performing ads with AI-generated ones

businessinsider.com

101–105 of 105 posts

Re: Meta's ads tools started switching out top-performing ads with AI-generated ones

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would not proceed unless you are willing to invest $50/day for a minimum of 6 months. There is also the investment in learning, which would require 5-10 hours per week that whole time. I say this because anything short of that is likely to lose money and accomplish little. Not trying to gatekeep, so feel free to try it however you like. Maybe it is worth you trying to set up one ad just to see if you like the proce…

thanks for the heads up i dont think you are gate keeping at all do you have any recommendation for an alternative? seems like for now i am going to defer the Meta ad experiment , was thinking of targeting TikTok videos

Unfortunately, just changing ad platforms is no magic bullet. Tiktok advertising is no easier to ramp up on, in fact it will probably be more difficult and expensive.

If are worried about the significant expense and high risk of paid ads, which is very reasonable, I recommend you do not do paid ads at all.

I think a better alternative for you is to learn to create organic content, e.g. videos for IG and tiktok, or text posts for platforms like X. And learn to stimulate sales of your app that way.

This also has a long learning curve, but dodges the financial risk of paid ads. Once your organic content is dialed in enough to make consistent profit, you'll be much better positioned to start with ads and be successful.

Good luck!

Re: Meta's ads tools started switching out top-performing ads with AI-generated ones

#102
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having experience inside Metas culture, it is extremely metrics driven, sometimes without regard to side effects of optimizing a primary goal. So if someone was measuring their job performance on optimizing site-links then it’s very likely this could be happening.

A lot of people are also assuming intentional malice here when incompetence/lack-of-care is the main issue. If people saw how things are done at Meta, you wouldn’t be surprised. A lot of the stuff is functionally broken due to a lack of care from the top level. Your VPs and above just do not give a shit about quality whatsoever. This thing fucking prints money like crazy. Also, preventing loss of revenue and/or custo…

No, Meta doesn't get a pass on this one after "Jedi Blue" and faking video viewing metrics. These guys are criminals.

Generally, media buyers/advertisers are clueless when it comes to ad fraud. The big platforms have made a lot of money by abusing this fact. (I have over 15 years of experience in online marketing, on the advertiser, publisher and ad-network side. )

Re: Meta's ads tools started switching out top-performing ads with AI-generated ones

#103
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This savings is mostly for lawyers, since almost any of these cases would be taken on contingency. You are not paying up front. It therefore mostly affects case valuation

Contingency is not always an option. Of course attorneys can take on individual cases on contingency and make viable a case where the plaintiff lacks the spare six-figures of costs to even start the case. That does NOT mean there is no effect beyond "case valuation". Attorneys cannot simply take every case on contingency, and when the [potential reward]/[cost] ratio is not sufficient, the attorney must pass, and no s…

"This is especially true where small-dollar harms are being done, but at scale of millions, where ripping off consumers is systematic, or where harms such as pollution affected many."

All of these particular things seem exactly like the job of a state AG, or other form of regulator, vs private lawyers.

Political dysfunction aside, of course.

I'd personally rather the state AG and various consumer-friendly regulators of, say, california, have the billions of dollars going to the class action attorneys in that state.

Remember that class actions were not created to enable any of the things you cite. They were judiciary-created as a means of simple judicial efficiency (and requiring all affected plaintiffs to be grouped together). As such, outside of "they were there", it's not obvious why they are a particularly good way to solve the problems you give.

In case you think i'm particularly anti-consumer, i actually think LLC's should not exist and shareholders should be responsible for harms again. Which would likely obviate a lot of the practices class actions were suing over in the first place.

Re: Meta's ads tools started switching out top-performing ads with AI-generated ones

#104
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Contingency is not always an option. Of course attorneys can take on individual cases on contingency and make viable a case where the plaintiff lacks the spare six-figures of costs to even start the case. That does NOT mean there is no effect beyond "case valuation". Attorneys cannot simply take every case on contingency, and when the [potential reward]/[cost] ratio is not sufficient, the attorney must pass, and no s…

"This is especially true where small-dollar harms are being done, but at scale of millions, where ripping off consumers is systematic, or where harms such as pollution affected many." All of these particular things seem exactly like the job of a state AG, or other form of regulator, vs private lawyers. Political dysfunction aside, of course. I'd personally rather the state AG and various consumer-friendly regulators…

>>seem exactly like the job of a state AG, or other form of regulator, vs private lawyers. ...Political dysfunction aside, of course.

And there's the rub — most regulators and AGs will have some political leaning, and ALL of them have limited resources and will be unable to pursue every case, so many cases with great merit will go un-prosecuted.

For all of warts of class actions, that is an overwhelming benefit — a private class action, or latent threat thereof, can bring pressure where an AG or regulator will choose not to, or just lacks the budget and/or bandwidth to pursue.

And yes, making it easier to 'pierce the corporate veil' and create a stronger direct liability, including jail time, for officers, directors, and shareholders for intentional actions and omissions could do a lot to reduce harm of corporations.

Re: Meta's ads tools started switching out top-performing ads with AI-generated ones

#105
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"This is especially true where small-dollar harms are being done, but at scale of millions, where ripping off consumers is systematic, or where harms such as pollution affected many." All of these particular things seem exactly like the job of a state AG, or other form of regulator, vs private lawyers. Political dysfunction aside, of course. I'd personally rather the state AG and various consumer-friendly regulators…

>>seem exactly like the job of a state AG, or other form of regulator, vs private lawyers. ...Political dysfunction aside, of course. And there's the rub — most regulators and AGs will have some political leaning, and ALL of them have limited resources and will be unable to pursue every case, so many cases with great merit will go un-prosecuted. For all of warts of class actions, that is an overwhelming benefit — a p…

"And there's the rub — most regulators and AGs will have some political leaning, and ALL of them have limited resources and will be unable to pursue every case, so many cases with great merit will go un-prosecuted"

Private litigators also have some political leaning, often as much or more as the AG, but ignoring that for a second, the limited resources part is very fixable.

Additionally, they are accountable to the people that vote for them (directly in some states, indirectly otherwise), ignorant or not, whereas private litigators are not. This is a feature and not a bug.

Instead we are optimizing or deoptimizing (depending on the state and viewpoint) for private litigation.

IE either they cap it or they uncap it, or ....

Also, as a general rule, if you have way too many cases with merit, the problem is probably not resources, but something else.

IE if you have tens of thousands of murders you can't prosecute due to lack of resources, you actually have a bigger, and different problem, than "we don't have the resources to prosecute all these murders". You won't actually get much of anywhere by having the resources to prosecute them all because you won't be solving the bigger, different problem causing you to have tens of thousands of prosecutable murders in the first place.

The same is true of most of these consumer class action cases. Infinite lawsuits have not caused lots of behavior change, all told. It is very hard for me to believe that 10x infinite lawsuits will somehow do it.

Post reply on HN