Live data from Hacker News

Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

phys.org

101–110 of 247 posts

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#101
post #16

As someone who has worked in education for about a decade now, I use this quote a lot: You can’t understand Google unless you know that both Larry and Sergey were Montessori kids. — Marissa Mayer

There's a lot of luck in Larry and Sergey history.

It is not like they were Abel and Gauss as impressionable tech workers seem to think.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> had a good impression of "Montessori" from hearing that Larry/Sergey/Bezos went to one. Oh man… survivorship bias thinking is dangerous.

At last for me, the last thing I wanted to my son would be for him to become Jeff Bezos.

Well said, see my post above. People think that becoming a rich psycho is somehow great. Montessori schools I visited were depressing AF.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#103
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had a good impression of "Montessori" from hearing that Larry/Sergey/Bezos went to one. When I put my kid in it at 3 years old, he hated it. As I looked into it more, it seems to me that it is actually very rigid, with kids being able to play with just a small set of toys that don't really exercise their creativity, and with little opportunity for group play. We switched him to a Reggio Emilia school where the kids…

Same here. My three-year old loved maps and we always played with them (making map of her room, etc etc) We enrolled her at the local Montessori and she rushed to the map section but was told she is forbidden from using it until she takes the lesson on that or whatever is called. That lesson was 2-3 months away, and meanwhile all other kids were able to play with the maps. This, combined with other rigidities and a c…

I’m by far not an expert on it (my wife is, she teaches Montessori), but AFAIK what you observed was because it isn’t viewed as play, but as work - as in school work. All of the activities are called “works,” and they’re taken very seriously.

Part of this is, I think, to teach responsibility; for example, if a student gets a work out, they’re expected to put it back exactly how they found it. Montessori classrooms are incredibly well-organized, with everything having its (labeled) place.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#104

My children attended Montessori schools, and it really is a wonderful system. I would really like to see an extension of this learning method up through high school --- the closest thing I'm aware of was a school I attended in Mississippi for a couple of years --- classes were divided between academic and social, social classes (homeroom, phys ed, social studies, &c.) were attended at one's age, while academic classe…

> while academic classes (reading, math, science, geography, history, &c.) were by ability

My issue with this is that it just is selection bias, telling you nothing about how good the method is at teaching.

Does placing by ability actually helps student learn and score better? Or it's just that those who are good and bad already get divided up, and we know not why some are good and others are worse?

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#105
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like anything, there are lower and higher quality implementations of Montessori programs. What you are saying here does not reflect the Montessori program I went through myself, and I think I can credit the Montessori program with a great deal of my later stage curiosity and drive to outperform. I would say the same of the public high school that I attended. The attitude of the teachers and the other students was fan…

We visited multiple Montessori schools for both my kids and I can confidently say that I met some of the saddest and coldest teachers I have ever seen in my life. I am not sure that is really best environment for small kids. I myself went to shitty public schools and became an exceptional student later on. I am doubtful about the impact of early education on future success.

Yeah. In general I also don't like much about the vibe of Montessori parents.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#106
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had a good impression of "Montessori" from hearing that Larry/Sergey/Bezos went to one. When I put my kid in it at 3 years old, he hated it. As I looked into it more, it seems to me that it is actually very rigid, with kids being able to play with just a small set of toys that don't really exercise their creativity, and with little opportunity for group play. We switched him to a Reggio Emilia school where the kids…

I had the exact same experience except my child is still there. No free play, very little time outdoors, very little interaction with classmates, no creativity allowed. Unhappy child who regularly doesn't want to go. We try to give her outdoor play with friends after preschool to make up for it.

I’m sorry you’ve had that experience. My kids’ Montessori school has a playground, athletic field, and butts up against woods, which they regularly go into for activities. One of the classes actually spends most of their time outside - weather permitting - because that teacher is getting her Master’s in some form of education that focuses on outdoor learning.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We visited multiple Montessori schools for both my kids and I can confidently say that I met some of the saddest and coldest teachers I have ever seen in my life. I am not sure that is really best environment for small kids. I myself went to shitty public schools and became an exceptional student later on. I am doubtful about the impact of early education on future success.

Yeah. In general I also don't like much about the vibe of Montessori parents.

[flagged]

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#108

My children attended Montessori schools, and it really is a wonderful system. I would really like to see an extension of this learning method up through high school --- the closest thing I'm aware of was a school I attended in Mississippi for a couple of years --- classes were divided between academic and social, social classes (homeroom, phys ed, social studies, &c.) were attended at one's age, while academic classe…

I can’t find any record of a Mississippi Supreme Court decision regarding a program like you described. I did find evidence that Mississippi actively permits dual enrollment for secondary and post secondary education. Do you have a source for the decision you referenced? https://law.justia.com/codes/mississippi/title-37/chapter-15...

No, after I left the school it was all second/third-hand from letters to my folks from other parents whose children were still attending.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also had an obvious and unhelpful result. Of course kids who spend all day learning will know that stuff better than kids who don't. What really matters is long term life outcomes. Rudolf Steiner would say all that early learning is harmful and they should have been playing and imagining spiritual things.

"What really matters is long term life outcomes." What would those be and how do we measure them? There are studies that show Montessori students tend to have better executive function, better working memory, and no significant difference in creativity. I'm not aware of any that look at lifetime income or anything like that.

I'm not exactly sure, but measuring performance on education tests as a child is just a proxy for the whole point of education and raising children and it could even be backwards.

Re: Public Montessori programs strengthen learning outcomes at lower costs: study

#110
Given all the money spent on trying different educational models to achieve better outcomes, it's really gratifying to see a result suggesting that improvement is actually possible. I have a lot of teachers in my family and they tend to take the perspective that education is an engineering problem rather than a research problem. That is, any apparent progress is due to extra funding or filtering students or the like.

> "Those costs do not include anticipated savings from improved teacher morale and retention, a dynamic demonstrated in other data."

That seems like some kind of supportive evidence as well. Teachers should logically be happier when working inside a system optimized for teaching efficacy!

Personally: we put our child in a Montessori preschool because we liked its emphasis on self-directed learning (I kind of think all learning has to be self-directed on some level. Even a lecture requires you to listen to and think about the lecture, instead of something else). We later moved him to a Reggio Emilia program for non-pedagogical reasons (there were problems with the building that the Montessori school was in). They're definitely different—in Montessori, he mostly played on his own, and in Reggio we now see him in pairs and groups all the time. I have no idea which is better, but his teachers at the Reggio school seem to like it.

Post reply on HN