Live data from Hacker News

Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

github.com

101–110 of 156 posts

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#101
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not an ML expert, but is it feasible to train the weights using the actual Twitter feed as an oracle?

No, even if you somehow were able to download the corpus of all public X posts. There are many hidden signals that are feature engineered in good recsys, and the stripped-down algo won't be able to replicate them.

[dead]

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#103
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is 100% for headlines and Musk to be able to say "we're open" during interviews. Its actual usefulness is not the point

The reporters should be getting down to the point and asking Elon Musk about the practical usefulness of such a heavily redacted public release.

I can think of like 3 institutions that have reporters who would ask that kind of question (The Register, Ars Technica and 404media) and I don't think Musk is going to be sitting across the table from any of them, ever.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#104
post #43
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Republican, Democrat, and Elon. Wow.

Is this real? We accept that the algorithm may link you abstractly with other people, but I didn’t think they were literally labeling on this level. If you just say “we look for what’s similar and leave it at that”, then there’s much less liability. This is political targeting. This guy was one of the biggest political donors, how can this fly?

You do realize people officially register as party members right? I have no idea why this upsets you. It's just categorization. I fucking hope my feeds do this, I do not want to see maga trash.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? I've never been a twitter user

Post Musk Twitter is amazing. It lets you see how stories, opinions that you support or don’t are attacked from all sides and Community noted / @grok fact checked … a lot of UX changes too .. pre Musk, the moderation / banning was biased and arbitrary (who is watching the watchers?) .. my personal fav was to see the special tick removed from journalists ..

I agree i was banned pre Musk i think now its more free and less bans

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#107
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s not. The last “algorithm” release was a random grab bag of code which existed in some of the Twitter repo that might have been tangentially related to recommendations/feed. Source: worked at Twitter in ML/recsys.

[flagged]

"..." all over the place in 2 year old code is production code?

And people who work at X don't say they work at Twitter.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#108
post #43
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Republican, Democrat, and Elon. Wow.

Is this real? We accept that the algorithm may link you abstractly with other people, but I didn’t think they were literally labeling on this level. If you just say “we look for what’s similar and leave it at that”, then there’s much less liability. This is political targeting. This guy was one of the biggest political donors, how can this fly?

> This guy was one of the biggest political donors, how can this fly?

The system is rigged. Haven't you noticed yet?

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#109
post #66

Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but why does Bluesky feel so much faster to load and interact with compared to X? On the surface, both have similar interfaces and equally rich content, yet Bluesky consistently feels snappier and more responsive, even though it’s the newer platform.

No idea, but Twitter is functionally un-usable if you're not logged in.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#110
post #18
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you can't, and it's 100% sure it's not this code running in prod

100% huh? That's a bold statement with no supporting evidence.

Claiming that there's no supporting evidence is a bold (and obviously false) claim when the code is 2 years old and heavily redacted.
Post reply on HN