Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unless you are comparing a generic to a name brand in a situation where the insurance company forces the name brand that shouldn't be the case. For better or worse in your hypothetical the uninsured price legally has to be $1,000 for medicine. They can write off part of that but no one would write off 99.8% as the insurance company would sue their pants off.
> that shouldn't be the case Oh, I agree. But it is. > For better or worse in your hypothetical the uninsured price legally has to be $1,000 for medicine. No, it doesn't. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/cost-weight-loss-... "In March, Novo Nordisk cut the price of all doses of Wegovy by 23% for people paying in cash, dropping it from $650 to $499 per month for uninsured patients or those without coverage.…
How often do health insurers say no to patients? (2023)
101–103 of 103 posts
Ah yes $500 vs $1,349 is exactly the same as $20 vs $1,000
Re: How often do health insurers say no to patients? (2023)
#102Re: How often do health insurers say no to patients? (2023)
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but you'll often find that in a high-deductible plan the insurance company gets a "discount" of your $1k med down to $200, which they brag about in your EOB… but the medication's cash price for uninsured people would be $20. You're out of pocket $180 more than you should be, and paying the $20 cash price out of pocket means your deductible doesn't budge.
What if the medicine costs 100$ to produce, should uninsured have to pay that rather than a subsidized 20$?
Given US universities did the research for nearly every drug on the market, we've already paid for it.
Universities need to get into the drug production business