Live data from Hacker News

VibeVoice: A Frontier Open-Source Text-to-Speech Model

microsoft.github.io

101–110 of 177 posts

Re: VibeVoice: A Frontier Open-Source Text-to-Speech Model

#102
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there any better model you can point at? I would be interested in having a listen. There are people – and it does not matter what it's about – that will overstate the progress made (and others will understate it, case in point). Neither should put a damper on progress. This is the best I personally have heard so far, but I certainly might have missed something.

It’s tough to name the best local TTS since they all seem to trade off on quality and features and none of them are as good as ElevenLabs’ closed-source offering. However Kokoro-82M is an absolute triumph in the small model space. It curbstomps models 10-20x its size in terms of quality while also being runnable on like, a Raspberry Pi. It’s the kind of thing I’m surprised even exists. Its downside is that it isn’t s…

There's a certain know-nothing feeling I get that makes me worried if we start at the link (which has data showing it > ElevenLabs quality), jump to eh it's actually worse than anything I've heard then last 2 years, and end up at "none are as good as ElevenLabs" - the recommendation and commentary on it, of course, has nothing to do with my feeling, cheers

Re: VibeVoice: A Frontier Open-Source Text-to-Speech Model

#103

I read the comments praising these voices as very life like, and went to the page primed to hear very convincing voices. That is not at all what I heard though. The voices are decent, but the intonation is off on almost every phrase, and there is a very clear robotic-sounding modulation. It's generally very impressive compared to many text-to-speech solutions from a few years ago, but for today, I find it very uninsp…

Is there any better model you can point at? I would be interested in having a listen. There are people – and it does not matter what it's about – that will overstate the progress made (and others will understate it, case in point). Neither should put a damper on progress. This is the best I personally have heard so far, but I certainly might have missed something.

Not OS or local, but just try ChatGPT Voice Conversation mode. To my ears, it's a generation ahead of these VibeVoice samples.

Re: VibeVoice: A Frontier Open-Source Text-to-Speech Model

#104
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. For some reason the female voices are waaay more convincing than the male ones too, which sound barely better than speech synthesis from a decade ago.

Results correlate to investment, and there’s more in synthesizing female coded voices. As for the why female coded voices gets more investments, we all know, only difference is in attitude towards that (the correct answer, of course, is “it sucks”)

We all know? Female voices have better intelligibility? That's my guess anyway.

Re: VibeVoice: A Frontier Open-Source Text-to-Speech Model

#107
post #97

does anyone know of recent TTS options that let you specify IPA rather than written words? Azure lets you do this, but something local (and better than existing OS voices) would be great for my project.

I'm using Kokoro via https://github.com/remsky/Kokoro-FastAPI. It has a `generate_audio_from_phonemes()` endpoint that I'm sure maps to the Kokoro library if you want to use it directly.

My usage is for Chinese, but the phonemes it generated looked very much like IPA.

Re: VibeVoice: A Frontier Open-Source Text-to-Speech Model

#110

What an odd name to me, becaus "Vibe" is, in my mind, equal to somewhat poor quality. Like "Vibe Coding". But that's probably just some bias from my side.

Vibe coding just became a term this spring. I doubt that that the substantial part, like giving it a project code name and getting company approval of this research project started after that. It's not libe vibe has a negative connotation in general yet.
Post reply on HN