Ollama Turbo
101–110 of 251 posts
Re: Ollama Turbo
#102Watching ollama pivot from a somewhat scrappy yet amazingly important and well designed open source project to a regular "for-profit company" is going to be sad. Thankfully, this may just leave more room for other open source local inference engines.
we have always been building in the open, and so is Ollama. All the core pieces of Ollama are open. There are areas where we want to be opinionated on the design to build the world we want to see. There are areas we will make money, and I wholly believe if we follow our conscious we can create something amazing for the world while making sure we can keep it fueled to keep it going for the long term. Some of the ideas…
Re: Ollama Turbo
#103Called it. It's very unfortunate that the local inference community has aggregated around Ollama when it's clear that's not their long term priority or strategy. Its imperative we move away ASAP
Re: Ollama Turbo
#104If these are FP4 like the other ollama models then I'm not very interested. If I'm using an API anyway I'd rather use the full weights.
Re: Ollama Turbo
#105Called it. It's very unfortunate that the local inference community has aggregated around Ollama when it's clear that's not their long term priority or strategy. Its imperative we move away ASAP
Re: Ollama Turbo
#106Called it. It's very unfortunate that the local inference community has aggregated around Ollama when it's clear that's not their long term priority or strategy. Its imperative we move away ASAP
I moved away from ollama in favor of llama-server a couple of months ago and never missed anything, since I'm still using the same UI.
Re: Ollama Turbo
#107Re: Ollama Turbo
#108Re: Ollama Turbo
#109Re: Ollama Turbo
#110Called it. It's very unfortunate that the local inference community has aggregated around Ollama when it's clear that's not their long term priority or strategy. Its imperative we move away ASAP