The first comment on that article caught my attention: > I am a grad student in the philosophy department at SFSU and teach critical thinking. This semester I pivoted my entire class toward a course design that feels more like running an obstacle course with AI than engaging with Plato. And my students are into it. It would be interesting to take a class of students and set them an assignment to come up with assignme…
AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
101–110 of 322 posts
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps not. But it'll probably find sufficient passages/instances that are useful.
Yes but the question did say ALL. Finding some yes it might well be quicker than a manual read. So it depends on what the actual requirement is.
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
The “explain how we got here” approach to history has some pretty big limitations. The historical actors had no idea where the future was going. When we examine their actions from the perspective of the single contingency that ended up happening we will almost necessarily miss meaningful understanding and make things seem inevitable when they really weren’t. There’s interesting writing to be done in this mode but it…
> The historical actors had no idea where the future was going. Does it matter in order to explain how things came to be? Understanding their motivations, the incentives that led them to do what they did, the sociopolitical context they were inserted into, the limitations of a historical perspective (quite often the accounts of past historical figures were written by people invested in portraying it in one way or ano…
Yes. Writing on historiography has been detailed about the ways that this sort of framing can be limiting.
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Designing "ChatGPT-proof assignments" feels to me like a similar level of intellectual challenge. This is indeed true. But a challenge is that few professors are being given the time and training to help do this. When you are on a 4/4 and just keeping your head above water you don't tend to have enough time to adopt experimental pedagogies and completely replan your courses. And professors are largely being tasked…
>on a 4/4 That's teaching four distinct courses?
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#105Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#106I spent some years as a teacher and so have some first-hand experience here; my take, for what it's worth, is that LLMs have indeed blown a gaping hole in the structure of education as actually practiced in the USA. That hole is: much of education is based on the assumption that the unsupervised production of written artifacts is proof of progress in learning. LLMs can produce those artifacts now, incidentally disrup…
The definition of learning has not changed. One of our first written records is a man complaining that this newfangled writing thing will make the students lazy, they will no longer have to remember their studies. Education will adapt.
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#107Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Among others, Howard Rheingold has been active in this space. For those interested, check out the Peeragogy Handbook and the post that sparked the idea[0]. > The more I give my teacher-power to students and encourage them to take more responsibility for their own learning, the more they show me how to redesign my ways of teaching [0]: https://clalliance.org/blog/toward-peeragogy/
It's fun to see how old that article is and that the ideas still apply! Power dynamics are not considered enough when people talk about education. My believe is that the more you balance the power dynamic, the more learning is prioritized over education.
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#109I'm pretty sceptical about the entire use of computers in education. For myself, I seem to be incapable of learning anything unless I read it from paper and write down notes in the margin or in my (paper) notebook. Obviously I use screens every day (being a programmer ...) but for actual recall of new material, I need to use paper. Also if I'm in a physical meeting or conference, I never have a laptop open, and I tak…
Re: AI makes the humanities more important, but also weirder
#110I would love to be a literature student today. Consume the classics in audiobook form while flâneuring or gaming. Red team every essay with ChatGPT. Become a top tier Genius.com contributor for poetry. Listen to all the online lectures from Oxford, Yale etc. Effortlessly pick up where past critics have left off because the AI can summarise all contributions on any topic. Find every reference to support your thesis in…