Live data from Hacker News

Nebula Sans

nebulasans.com

101–107 of 107 posts

Re: Nebula Sans

#101
post #60

Ok, it is a font alright. To me, it looks exactly as all the other fonts I have on my OS already, but I guess that's just how it is if you are not in the font bubble.

Erik Spiekermann is a German typographer who gave a talk called (something to the effect of) “why do we need so many typefaces”. At one point, Erik simply shows a slide with “this is why”, in what is clearly the Marlboro font. Fonts have different metrics which affect recognisability, legibility, and understanding. There are fonts which evoke a feeling (think heavy metal band), others which are practical (exaggerated…

The dyslexia fonts don't work:

> Researchers put the font to the test, comparing it with two other popular fonts designed for legibility—Arial and Times New Roman—and discovered that the purportedly dyslexia-friendly font actually reduced reading speed and accuracy. In addition, none of the students preferred to read material in OpenDyslexic, a surprising rebuke for a font specifically designed for the task.

> In a separate 2018 study, researchers compared another popular dyslexia font—Dyslexie, which charges a fee for usage—with Arial and Times New Roman and found no benefit to reading accuracy and speed. As with the previous dyslexia font, children expressed a preference for the mainstream fonts. “All in all, the font Dyslexie, developed to facilitate the reading of dyslexic people, does not have the desired effect,” the researchers concluded. “Children with dyslexia do not read better when text is printed in the font Dyslexie than when text is printed in Arial or Times New Roman.”

https://www.edutopia.org/article/do-dyslexia-fonts-actually-...

Re: Nebula Sans

#102
post #20

“neutral aesthetic” Subdued, muted and neutral seems to be very much “in” at the moment. On one hand it definitely gives us highly readable, usable interfaces and text. But I do miss the chaos and vibrance of the early web. Modern web is starting to look really washed out.

Sans serif fonts can't distinguish between Weird AI and Weird Al, so I don't know what makes them readable.

Re: Nebula Sans

#104
post #30

Little PSA: a) This is a clone of Whitney, an incredibly beautiful and unique typeface from 2004 b) Whitney was designed by Tobias Frere-Jones c) He was an equal co-founder of the H&fJ foundry d) He designed the vast majority of their most famous fonts, including Gotham, Archer and Armada e) Somehow, for years, Hoefler never did the paperwork to confirm FJ's co-ownership f) When pressed, he instead kicked FJ out, kep…

How do we know that isn't TFJ's story, that Hoefler doesn't have a very different one, and what the truth is?

Re: Nebula Sans

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are the consumer of fonts. The user of fonts is a designer. If you don't design, this entire debate is outside your field of concern.

This thread started with > Ok, it is a font alright. To me, it looks exactly as all the other fonts I have on my OS already, but I guess that's just how it is if you are not in the font bubble. So, yeah. Grandparent tried to justify this new whatever by saying lots of words, none of which really seemed to matter outside of the font bubble.

Calling a field of industry a bubble is being demeaning without justification.

Just because you are ignorant of something doesn't make it insignificant. That the significance is lost on you is YOUR problem.

Re: Nebula Sans

#106
post #2

So this is a free Whitney with some tweaks? > Source Sans was the perfect foundation for Nebula Sans because it shares many primary characteristics with Whitney SSm, our previous brand typeface One differing characteristic presumably being requiring payment to Hoefler & Co.

> One differing characteristic presumably being requiring payment to Hoefler & Co.

* Monotype

Re: Nebula Sans

#107
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You seem to know a thing or two about typeface design. What do you think about Alegreya, Playfair, and Ubuntu fonts?

Alegreya seems like a Garamond derivative, but it has a very interesting character; the glyph stroke widths—especially the verticals—have an intriguing taper. I really like the lowercase italic 'g' and 'h'. Playfair is Didone, and I feel Didones (this includes TeX's default, Computer Modern) don't really do well on displays because of the very high contrast between the ball serifs and rather thin vertical strokes. Ot…

Thank you!

Alegreya also has a much larger x-height than Garamond...

Post reply on HN