Live data from Hacker News

Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

joelgustafson.com

101–110 of 252 posts

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#101
post #57
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasn't this also sort of a feature with Twitter? iirc the retweet and other now popular features were originally hacked together by users

Retweet was original using the text "RT". Hashtags were also invented by Twitter users.

Wasn't the @ also invented by users? I remember it was fascinating to watch this network self organize and create conventions of its own, that are now used everywhere.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The LinkedIn vs HiQ case makes it so that scraping data behind a login screen is not okay but publicly accessible pages are fair game.

Was this the main reasoning for moving everything behind login more than data hoarding of the viewers?

My personal belief is yes. Legal talks to management after the case concludes, tells them this is the new reality, and management tells product to make the change.

At no time is management obligated or even remotely motivated to tell end users the real reason for making the change, because users believing that the platform is just a greedy corporation is better than them realizing that the platform will just roll over if the police presents them with a subpoena to snitch on a user.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of that is remotely close to hate speech. President Trump is not a marginalized community.

Hate speech or not, there is nothing pleasant about it. The irony is that the 'holier-than-thou' crowd, who are against hate and for love all over the world, overwhelmingly post negative political comments and are rooting for X/Twitter to collapse. This ^ is a good problem to solve in social networks.

It isn’t ironic to dislike intolerant people or to voice it. It is an individual’s prerogative to imagine that tolerance must be completely uniform, but that doesn’t reflect the reality of groups or systems made up of actual humans.

Here is a relevant article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#104

I must be one of those tiny dots just floating in nothingness because my BSKY feed is a dead zone. I've posted, I've replied, I've liked and tried to be an active participant but nothing seems to stick. There's only so many posts I can publish "for myself" before I lose interest. Contrast this with early Twitter where everyone was just super excited, and eager to follow new people. I don't get it, shouldn't a new soc…

Did you try Mastodon? Many have a better experience there.

Mastadon has a massive problem with furries, people with loli anime-avatars or people who fit the «purple haired» stereotype.

It’s very off-putting and alienating for normal people.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#105
post #55

Bluesky and atproto seem to be built to be hackable. Someone in the community recently built a searchable directory of Bluesky "Starter Packs" (which are a way for a user to publish a set of interesting people & feeds to follow, primarily to help newcomers bootstrap their experience): https://blueskydirectory.com/starter-packs/all Dan Abramov posted about it earlier today, saying he liked it and: "the fact that it ca…

Another argument is that it could lead to a bot problem 10x worse than twitters ever was.

I'm not sure you could be worse than Twitter right now on bots unless you are pursposely trying to be worse.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#106
> “I filtered out accounts that follow more than 50k accounts, or follow less than 5 accounts and have less than 5 followers, leaving 7.7 million nodes.”

So not quite 13M but almost half of them, pretty cool nonetheless

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#107

I'm part of the wave of users who migrated to bluesky last week. I have to say I really like it so far, which surprised me a bit given that I had been underwhelmed by mastodon before. I already spend more time in bluesky than in twitter. For those (like me) who don't know what bluesky is, it's basically a carbon copy of twitter circa 2015, down to an almost identical UI. Except that there's no monetization, no ads, n…

How does it compare to Threads?

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#108
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bluesky seems to be also very common among artists.

The mid-October bump was artists discovering that posting on Twitter allows them to use posts for training AI. https://bskycharts.edavis.dev/bluesky-year.html

That and the change to how blocking works on Twitter, which coincided with the AI policy change.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#109
As a broader comment about Bluesky, it seems to me that it's heavily left-leaning, while Twitter/X is obviously leaning more and more to the right. Amazingly, it seems that the BlueSky/X dichotomy is another emergent manifestation of a fracturing and continually more polarized society. In my opinion, what we will ultimately end up with is two echo chambers, each catering to opposite ends of the spectrum, each radicalizing their respective userbase, and each further amplifying the divide in society today.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#110

I'm part of the wave of users who migrated to bluesky last week. I have to say I really like it so far, which surprised me a bit given that I had been underwhelmed by mastodon before. I already spend more time in bluesky than in twitter. For those (like me) who don't know what bluesky is, it's basically a carbon copy of twitter circa 2015, down to an almost identical UI. Except that there's no monetization, no ads, n…

How does it compare to Threads?

Anecdotally, I see a lot more “normal” human to human engagement than the addressed-to-millions engagement bait I see on Threads.
Post reply on HN