Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, sure, if we still lived as small groups of hunter-gatherers, many of today's problems would not exist. But many of yesterday's problems could never have been solved.
It isn't a dichotomy. But making a dichotomy is thing technophiles do a lot and I'm not sure why. It's clear that we can go back to smaller communities and keep some of the newer ways. I think technophiles irrationally put everything that isn't "advanced tech society" into the box of hunter-gatherer because they can't psychologically cope with the idea that there is an alternative to the unsustainable technological w…
Gen AI Makes Legal Action Cheap – and Companies Need to Prepare
101–104 of 104 posts
Re: Gen AI Makes Legal Action Cheap – and Companies Need to Prepare
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should sometimes review the Indian judicial system and their judgements. I have never seen a more self congratulatory, smug and confident yet incompetent people in my life. All hiding under some pretense of intellectual superiority that is enabled by a corrupt collegium system that makes it difficult to disrupt. Essentially run by a handful of families and inner circle. Just another shadow govt. type entity.
Bangladeshi Supreme Court decisions are similar. Just completely lawless. Makes “emanations from penumbras” seem rigorous in comparison.
Re: Gen AI Makes Legal Action Cheap – and Companies Need to Prepare
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bangladeshi Supreme Court decisions are similar. Just completely lawless. Makes “emanations from penumbras” seem rigorous in comparison.
The one comparing Islam to a national bird or something was right up there.
The high court found a constitutional right to the quota even though it wasn’t in the text of the constitution. Textualism could have saved the government.
Re: Gen AI Makes Legal Action Cheap – and Companies Need to Prepare
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
The one comparing Islam to a national bird or something was right up there.
The Bangladesh high court ruling that reinstated the quota system and quite likely was the catalyst for the subsequent overthrow of the government was completely devoid of legal standards: https://www.supremecourt.gov.bd/resources/documents/2110398_... The high court found a constitutional right to the quota even though it wasn’t in the text of the constitution. Textualism could have saved the government.