101–110 of 170 posts
does anyone use mercurial anymore?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
cough" Linux Kernel cough*
Just because Linux is still using it doesn't mean it's any good.
Thankfully, jujutsu exists so I can use a good version control system and still interoperate with the misguided who don't realize just how bad Git sucks.
does anyone use mercurial anymore?
Prosody, at least: https://hg.prosody.im/
Mercurial has many neat features, and I much prefer working with it. I don't think Git is all bad, but I do feel sad that it has basically become an expectation that you use it, to the exclusion of all other options.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Besides all of that - Github has zero obligation to provide Free services to users, let alone non-users . The person you are responding to doesn't even want to make a free account yet expects to be able to use all of Github's services for free . That's some wild entitlement. The disconnect here is unreal...
> The person you are responding to doesn't even want to make a free account yet expects to be able to use all of Github's services for free. To be fair, definition of free depends. OPs argument was that they pay with data. That is not free if you think that you lose something. It is different question do we value it similarly.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The state of nginx is fine, similar to pfsense. Both made a "Plus" enterprise support offering, open source clones were forked, the originals remain dominant for enterprise and free users anyways. Not to detract from the great projects that are being worked on, like freenginx and opnsense.
> the originals remain dominant for enterprise and free users anyways. I'm a former pfSense user that reluctantly moved to OPNsense a handful of years ago after a lot of bad press around Netgate started circulating widely causing me to believe that support for the community offering might wane over time. I was under the impression that many people had moved off of pfSense for home use. I'm surprised by your assertion…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The alternative is having to do captchas and the like to use those features anonymously This is not the case. You may have noticed that Google Search, Bing, etc. don't require login or captcha to do a search. Billions of people use this search daily. And yet, they will throw a captcha at you, or even just say "you're a bot, stop bothering us" whether you're logged in or not , if their signals have detected what the…
For the last seven months, Google has pushed every non-login search from my house network through a captcha; the image captcha is typically five to infinite repetitions. Audio captcha works after a single run-through, except that it is frequently "unavailable" now. I don't know why. Google won't tell me. They just started doing the same for YouTube: "Please login because we have detected malicious behavior from your…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They already make enough money to run the service despite all the anonymous usage, but they'd like more money, you see. How mighty of you, a freeloading user in this specific situation, to assert Github has made " enough " money and therefore should offer you services at their own expense... you know, because you want it and therefore are entitled to it. > Github managed to offer anonymous search for 16 years befor…
It’s Microsoft, one of the most successful companies in human history. A poorly formed moralistic argument about “entitlement” is absurd. They certainly feel entitled to every aspect of my life, as do most other Fortune 500 companies, I think I can safely desire not needing to log in during a damn search.
Where else in life does this logic apply?
Perhaps you waded into a conversation without even understanding the core complaint. You can search on Github without a user account, entirely for free. However, they do not provide context-based code search to non-users, despite it still being free.
If for whatever reasons you cannot possibly be bothered to create a free user account out of some irrational fear Github will sell your codebase search history to advertisers (laugh out loud, literally), then you don't get to use that feature. Clone the repo and search it yourself, or find a different deep-pocketed service that lets you mooch everything for free.
tldr; Why are freeloaders always the loudest complainers?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To me, ordinary login is one of the things they've genuinely improved over time I feel? I absolutely never deal with logins more than once a day per machine? With stuff like Passkey support now, I basically click two buttons in 1Pass and I'm logged in instantly on ~everywhere. I also feel like I never have my tokens expire. I'm probably not doing the same stuff as you. It's sudo/elevated mode that really gets you I t…
GH Enterprise and public GH don't share tokens, so 1 login/day automatically becomes 2. Then, logins aren't shared across devices and 2 additional devices (phone and personal computer) makes 4 logins/day. Not sure why GitHub expires tokens so quickly, but I can replicate it across every device I own and multiple accounts. Maybe they just don't like me?
Of course then you can do everything with your never expiring ssh keys and application tokens… but that doesn't count :D
Help me understand: they just migrated and already have 21k stars?
In my project a considerable amount of stars come from blank accounts, that like also non-paying projects to avoid detection.
I moved to codeberg now for my non work projects.