Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How would the government even know that a big company is transgressing the rules? By investigating a complaint? From the article: The Dutch DPA started the investigation on Uber after more than 170 French drivers complained...
Your comment and the article however don’t explain what the group complained about and how did they know data was being transmitted to the us, though. Did they made the allegations up and they happened to be right? I don’t think that’s the case.
In any event the fine is mostly for not having adequate protections in place. Those protections? Better contracts between wholly-owned subsidiaries of Uber. So, not much protection at all! This is very much Uber shooting themselves in the foot by not doing their homework. Again.
This is the DPA's press release: https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/current/dutch-d...
The fine is here, and is 48 pages long, and in Dutch: https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/documenten/boete-u...
The investigation report isn't included. It may surface if Uber decided to right the fine and take it to court. Or, if some-one takes an interest and tries to get it via the local 'freedom of information act' equivalent, though that might take just as long and will result in a heavily redacted version being made available.