The general trend of insulating the human customer away from human customer service is just a horrible thing that keeps spreading. It was bad enough outsourcing customer support to overseas agents who have their hands tied to only read from a script and generally do nothing, and now we're just talking to computers that can generally do nothing. The message is the same: we don't actually care about our customers. I ow…
>The general trend of insulating the human customer away from human customer service is just a horrible thing that keeps spreading. A law is being debated in my EU country where companies can't put customers on hold more than 10 minutes before reaching an actual human for support. I hope it passes and that it spreads across the union and also applies to tech companies as well.
If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
101–110 of 200 posts
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#102The general trend of insulating the human customer away from human customer service is just a horrible thing that keeps spreading. It was bad enough outsourcing customer support to overseas agents who have their hands tied to only read from a script and generally do nothing, and now we're just talking to computers that can generally do nothing. The message is the same: we don't actually care about our customers. I ow…
ISPs probably take the cup for worst ratio of technical issues to technical idiots. It's not just a modem, there's a line, an internal network and a really bothersome user all working against optimal service.
Your desire to handle that all in-house by organic, corn-fed, English-as-their-first-language meat-bags is lovely but you'd be bankrupt in a week.
This isn't new. We've had customer service levels for decades. What happened before is you talked to non-technical staff following scripts before escalation. Then that model pushed those staff overseas. Now the lowest rung is a LLM. The trick they have to re-learn when to let the user tell you to step back and fetch a real person. That, and getting the tone of the LLM to not declare everything as if that'll definitely fix the problem.
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#103Is this thread comprised from bots or just plain ignorance? AI Chatbots have been outperforming human agents in every category imaginable. Why wouldn't you want to talk to an AI agent until it can't help you and routes you to a human? Human wait times have always been insane, upwards of 30 minutes for any service i've used, why not just talk to an AI NOW until a human can come online?
That’s a system designed not to help you. Maybe they’re doing the same thing now, but framing AI as the problem lets these companies off the hook for what I’d consider “working as intended”.
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#104Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#105Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
AT&T gigabit internet tends to be $1,200 a year and has incredible margins on profitability.
AT&T's consumer wireline business had 4.9% margins in 2023. https://investors.att.com/~/media/Files/A/ATT-IR-V2/financia...
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#107I hate bad chatbots but when done right its a nice middleground between support and waiting in a huge queue. What many here on HN don't realize is some significant portion of call center activity is people asking things like "Whats my balance?".
Exactly.
We all have some level of knowledge and experience with things we consider obvious and basic like password managers, self-service (apps, online logins), etc. Bank of America has 69 million customers. I'd love to see the internal stats on what their customer service interfaces handle but I'd venture to guess they have some unbelievable amount of interactions on a daily basis for things like balances, paying bills (really), password resets, etc.
Then consider services even more within our wheelhouse like ISPs - I'm sure we've all had that Tier 1 rep experience of laying on the couch while a rep goes through their script asking questions/diagnosing with things that anyone here would have gone well above and beyond before even calling. I know that whenever I have issues with anything I will do whatever I can within my own control and capability to AVOID the hoop-jumping, phone trees, queues, etc. All we're ever trying to do is navigate their script to get to Tier 2 or beyond.
Then, finally, when I get them to do a truck roll because it's some outside cable plant issue or whatever the tech sees I have 10 gbit ethernet everywhere they look at me wide-eyed and ask "So... What do you do?".
However, to your point from the perspective of the business it makes sense... Take Comcast as another example - they have over 32 million customers from all walks of life with an extremely wide range of ages, experience, capabilities, etc. Ideally you could call/chat/whatever and get a capable human right away but that's just not possible at the scale many of these entities operate.
My mother (73 years old) just fell victim to the classic "get an email, click a link, get a popup, call "Microsoft", install remote access software, and login to your bank account" scam. She was completely convinced she was talking to Microsoft and the Federal Trade Commission (what?!?), her phones were tapped, and people were following/watching her. Next thing she knew she was at her bank taking out every cent she could get access to and driving around feeding hundred dollar bills into Bitcoin ATM machines. Really.
Watching her interact with customer service interfaces was eye opening (as was falling victim to this ridiculous scam in the first place). My takeaway was "Oh, she is why they have these things implemented the way they do".
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who are your customers? Other businesses or average people?
It's B2B, mostly small businesses
Average people wouldn't be willing to pay enough to provide such level of service.
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And it's not like customer service of the same service providers without this tech was appreciated by people before these chatbots. This is just "but humans also". I wish our industry's collective standards didn't allow for just replacing one subpar experience with a very similar one that has less empathy and is lots cheaper.
What would your ideal proposed solution be like? If you owned a telecom company that provided internet services and mobile plans for everyday people?
I'm with Jeff on this one.
LLMs are an obviously terrible solution for any problem that actually has a complex but invariant solution.
Personally I prefer rigid, automated questionnaire filtering that gets you to a real person as soon as possible.
I also thoroughly believe in a) human support chats and b) believing the people answering them to be decent human beings who deserve my clarity, preparedness, politeness and empathy, and I think more should be done on chat interfaces to make them slightly less amenable to stupid unstructured queries. You help people ask the question right.
Re: If AI chatbots are the future, I hate it
#110The general trend of insulating the human customer away from human customer service is just a horrible thing that keeps spreading. It was bad enough outsourcing customer support to overseas agents who have their hands tied to only read from a script and generally do nothing, and now we're just talking to computers that can generally do nothing. The message is the same: we don't actually care about our customers. I ow…
I think your opinion stems from never having dealt with normal people interfacing with a technical product . They're not asking the same questions you or I might, they're asking documented questions and they're doing it in obscene volume, with such little ability to help themselves. ISPs probably take the cup for worst ratio of technical issues to technical idiots. It's not just a modem, there's a line, an internal n…
This sentiment is, in essence, the problem. It's perfectly logical for this trend of distancing customers from their , as you put it, "all in-house by organic, corn-fed, English-as-their-first-language-meat-bags" when you start with the core concept that the _only_ purpose of a company is to earn capital.