Live data from Hacker News

The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

wired.com

101–110 of 129 posts

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#101

Tale as old as time: lack of safety culture due to reality denying executives causes people to die.

I don't think the executive going down in their own creation and using a video game controller before imploding is a tale as old time.

It is too. But it's a very different tale from the one where the executive just orders other people to take the bullet.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#102
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"the passengers were made aware of the risks" From people asking them to sign this who otherwise hand-waived the risks away?

I hadn't heard that before. Did Oceangate lie about or understate the risks?

It's easy (and legally advised) to have a waiver mentioning all the risks, while also totally downplaying them in your sales pitch and live communications that go on before such a thing gets signed.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#103
post #62

One interesting thing about this saga is we learned just how much of a badass James Cameron is. James Cameron put together the team that designed the DeepSea Challenger, which he took to the bottom of the Mariana Trench, far deeper than Titanic. One interesting tidbid (IIRC) is that they spent 3 years just designing the pressure vessel in software before they ever built anything, so precise the engineering had to be.…

Surprisingly the DeepSea Challenger was only $10M as well. Thats certainly a ton of money, but it's in the same ballpark as what ocean gate spent.

True but Ocean Gate were planning on multiple use, surely a higher bar.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hadn't heard that before. Did Oceangate lie about or understate the risks?

It's easy (and legally advised) to have a waiver mentioning all the risks, while also totally downplaying them in your sales pitch and live communications that go on before such a thing gets signed.

Sure, but did they do that? I've seen plenty of reporting about the extensive and blunt waiver but nothing about them misleading passengers or, as you said, hand-waiving the risks away.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The word "found" implies judicial discovery of truth through due process. This was a settlement. Nobody was found to be at fault, the information was highly dangerous and therefore valuable, if you want to eliminate the market of buying silence reform due process protections so they cannot be subverted by so called plea "deals" and so called settlement "agreements".

That's not right. "Settlement" does really say a judge oversaw the entire thing while a corporation bullied somebody working for the public interest into silence.

The lawsuit was settled out of court (https://www.wsbradio.com/news/national/documents-detail/VUTB...). Reading between the lines, I'm guessing OceanGate (a company with substantial financial resources) would have buried Lochbridge (an individual with substantially fewer financial resources) in lawsuits if he had not settled. (Not to mention the stress, hardship, and real-or-perceived threat of jail time for Lochbridge, should the court find him to be guilty.)

If you're implying that the judge was somehow complicit in helping OceanGate ('oversaw', meaning presided over and made decisions concerning), then please provide evidence of that?

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#106

Tale as old as time: lack of safety culture due to reality denying executives causes people to die.

I don't think the executive going down in their own creation and using a video game controller before imploding is a tale as old time.

Likely happened all the time during the feudal ages, when incompetent military commanders ordered their feudal subjects to engage in combat with disadvantage.

This event is just thinly veiled with a little bit more civility and tech progress.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#107
post #92
post #12

Respect the ocean, Space is somewhat mild in comparison.

The ocean, even the deep, is orders of magnitude easier and less dangerous than space...

As a former submariner (but not an astronaut, tbf), I think they’re on-par. They both actively want to kill you at all times.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#108

The whole idea was/is weird. I can understand undertaking a certain level of risk to get an amazing view of the Titanic, or some other wreck or reef, but that wasn't even what was offered. Regardless of who offered this dive and how it was managed, there would always have been some risk. That risk had to be stupid low for what was offered, a tiny window, offering a really poor viewing experience. It not even like the…

You don't understand the psychology of safari tourism.

A cramped interior and a small window, making the thing feel harder and less attainable, amps up the excitement.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#109

The Wired article clearly paints Rush as someone who was irresponsible and cavalier about even the basics of good engineering before testing a complex thing with real human lives that trusted him too much. In the essence of that argument at least, they're right. His using a prototype he knew to be a failure to then explore the ocean with customers aboard, under the same conditions as those that caused its test failur…

> In the world of exploring extremely harsh environments, some heavy risk is inevitable even if you do everything you know of right. In such contexts, something could go catastrophically wrong just as easily as it could all end successfully and a narrative will be constructed for why either was the case even if either outcome was interchangeably plausible.. That implies that what they were doing was somehow pioneerin…

> Save for military submarines and the occasional industrial accident, they’ve been extremely safe.

And even then, USN submarines are absurdly over-engineered. Or more aptly, they’re engineered to survive a massively hostile environment, even under multiple worst-case scenarios. FFS, the USS San Francisco slammed into an underwater mountain at flank speed at a depth of over 500 feet, and still managed to surface and get home under her own power. New sonar dome, ballast tanks, etc. and she was released for duty for another eight years.

This is only possible when you have multiple, redundant systems for everything.

Re: The Titan Submersible Disaster. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing

#110
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"the passengers were made aware of the risks" From people asking them to sign this who otherwise hand-waived the risks away?

I hadn't heard that before. Did Oceangate lie about or understate the risks?

I mean, did you read the article?
Post reply on HN