We are working on a project for a client which functions as an analysis tool for stocks using LLMs. Ingesting 10ks, presentations, news, etc. and doing comparative analysis and other reports. It works great, but one of the things we have learned (and it makes sense) is that traceability of the information for financial professionals is very important - where did the facts and information come from in what the AI is p…
I worked on a similar application and eventually we shelved it. We just could not be confident enough that the numbers in the report produced are correct. There were enough instances of inaccuracies to not use it for important decision making. Which actually meant a lot of double work.
Financial market applications of LLMs
101–110 of 116 posts
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've sort of come around on this. Yes, everything you listed is valuable and good. But the reality is all of it was built with money that came from banks and investors. The only reason to do anything scientific is to get investors to give you money. If you do something scientific that does not make people want to give you money you will impact no lives. In this way gaming financial markets is indeed the only point to…
Take particle physics for example, the LHC was incredibly expensive and most people's life won't be better that that we've found the Higgs field. It was also not paid by investors but public money. There are quite a lot of science that's basic research and it's done for scientific curiosity only with no clear way of translating that to marketable applications.
on one hand, I feel you should append "...yet" into that thought. just because it hasn't been useful technologically now doesn't mean it never will.
on the other hand, I've seen some physicists doubt that quarks even exist out of a controversy about Feynman's allegedly missing diagrams
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
That should be the goal, right? Good ideas get the funding they need as if by magic, yet nobody is sitting on the sidelines collecting rent. The best thing that AI can do for finance is eliminate it.
that sounds really bad for everyone collecting rent
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#104A lot of words for not bringing much new content to the discussion. I think the most interesting application of LLMs in Finance are (1) synthetic data models for data cleansing, (2) journal management, (3) anomaly tracking, (4) critiquing investments All of this should be done by professionals and nothing is "retail" ready.
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have tested this with multiple veterans and none could tell them apart - but they had a high conviction on which random walks were a good buy and which were compelling shorts.
And there is your arbitrage opportunity. If you can model how analysts will react to a particular timeseries, even if it was random until that point, you have some information about the future. It'd be a good question to figure out if there is a consensus or majority about how to interpret patterns among the people making decisions or writing quant algos, that's something one could use.
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
> is that gaming financial markets is the only real application of anything scientific medicine (living longer, curing disease, vaccines, etc), cheaper energy, cheaper transportation, cheaper construction, cheaper food, better communication, new forms of entertainment, just off the top of my head.
I've sort of come around on this. Yes, everything you listed is valuable and good. But the reality is all of it was built with money that came from banks and investors. The only reason to do anything scientific is to get investors to give you money. If you do something scientific that does not make people want to give you money you will impact no lives. In this way gaming financial markets is indeed the only point to…
Banks and investors provide liquidity to the system, which is just one of many things the market demands.
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#107There were some developments using LLMs in the timeseries domain which caught my attention. I toyed with the Chronos forecasting toolkit [1], and the results were predictably off by wild margins [2] What really caught my eye though was the "feel" of the predicted timeseries -- this is the first time I've seen synthetic timeseries that look like the real thing. Stock charts have a certain quality to them, once you've…
I used to work in financial software, and when writing the charting UIs, I'd wire them up to a randomwalk to generate fake time series data. It was a relatively common occurrence for a VP or the company CEO to walk by, look at my screen, and say "What stock is that? Looks interesting." Unpopular opinion backed up by experience: a randomwalk is the most effective model for generating timeseries that have the "feel" of…
Your take conflicts with my toy hypothesis, and I wouldn't mind being proven wrong if it saves me time and effort.
I wonder if the folks who were fooled by your screens were fooled by the random data itself, or the fact that it was presented within all the familiar chrome and doodads that people associate with stock price visualization.
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
that sounds really bad for everyone collecting rent
It would be great for people collecting rent. No fees, just profit.
Profits motivate the investor, but they impede the investment, and what we want are successful investments not happy investors.
I don't think human investors can manage to be less greedy than an AI designed to not be greedy. AI will get more efficient, while humans still have to eat. Also, the assumption we're working under is that humans also make worse investment decisions than the AI.
So if you're in need of abstractions to motivate others to help you with some venture that you can't do alone, why would you (or your employees) prefer the ones that have greedy third parties in the loop who are also misallocating resources?
There are domains where that human touch means something. We should not let AI run everything. But finance is not one of them, so why resist it becoming a solved problem?
The investors can compete on who can take smaller and smaller profits, aided by the AI, and once they've got their system nearly perfect, we copy it and have it take no profits at all. Thanks capitalism, you've done your job, now it's time to go get a different one.
If we start getting outcomes that we don't like, we can always just turn our backs on the AI-begotten abstractions and let the humans take another crack at it, but a system that runs itself without owners extracting profits should absolutely be the goal.
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#109We are working on a project for a client which functions as an analysis tool for stocks using LLMs. Ingesting 10ks, presentations, news, etc. and doing comparative analysis and other reports. It works great, but one of the things we have learned (and it makes sense) is that traceability of the information for financial professionals is very important - where did the facts and information come from in what the AI is p…
I assume you're ingesting PDFs. If so, how are you handling tables accurately?
If you haven't tried maybe worth a shot
Re: Financial market applications of LLMs
#110We are working on a project for a client which functions as an analysis tool for stocks using LLMs. Ingesting 10ks, presentations, news, etc. and doing comparative analysis and other reports. It works great, but one of the things we have learned (and it makes sense) is that traceability of the information for financial professionals is very important - where did the facts and information come from in what the AI is p…
I assume you're ingesting PDFs. If so, how are you handling tables accurately?