Is there any request pricing (I could not find a mention to it on the pricing page). Could be quite compelling for some use-cases if request pricing is free.
Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
101–110 of 194 posts
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is my biggest reservation towards Supabase. Google bought Firebase in 2014. I've seen Vercel run Nextjs in to the ground and fuck up their pricing for some short-term gains. And Figma almost got bought by Adobe. I have a hard time trusting products with heavy VC backing.
I’m not defending Vercel or VC backed companies per se, but I don’t understand your comments towards Vercel. They still offer a generous hobby plan and Next.js is still actively maintained open source software that supports self-hosting. Heroku might be a better example of a company that was acquired and the shut down their free plan.
Supabase and Next.js are not the same. Supabase can be self-hosted but it’s not easy to do so and a lot of moving parts. Most of my Next.js apps are not even on Vercel. They can easily be deployed to Netlify, Railway, Render, etc.
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not defending NextJS, I'm pretty out on it myself, but ISG requires a server to run. It pregenerates static content for defined pages and serves that until revalidating. If you've built a fully static bundle, nothing exists that would handle that incremental/revalidating logic.
I understand that ISG requires a server (Node.js runtime) to run it, that's why I want to disable it for my SSG Next.js static site, but I can't figure out how. I just want static hosting like S3+Cloudfront which is much faster.
You need to use static export:
https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/deploy...
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
we don't have any plans to get bought. we only have plans to keep pushing open standards/tools - hopefully we have enough of a track record here that it doesn't feel like lip service
Is it even up to you? Isn't it up to your Board of Directors (i.e investors) in the end?
Who controls the board, controls the company
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#105Cool to see that Supabase is adding S3 protocol! Nice to see more and more storage solutions available.
We, at Milvus, I've integrated S3, Parquet and other ones to make it possible for developers to use their data no matter what they use.
For those who have used both, how do you find the performance and ease of integration compares between Supabase and other solutions like Milvus that have had these features for some time?
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#106Do you think Supabase Storage (now or in the future) could be an attractive standalone S3 provider as an alternative to e.g MinIO?
It's more of a "accessibility layer" on top of S3 or any other s3-compatible backend (which means that it also works with MinIO out-of-the-box [0]) I don't think we'll ever build the underlying storage layer. I'm a big fan of what the Tigris[1] team have built if you're looking for other good s3 alternatives [0] https://github.com/supabase/storage/blob/master/docker-compo... [1] Tigris: https://tigrisdata.com
I'm still confused. Who is paying Amazon? Is it
1. You buy the storage from Amazon so I pay you and don't interact with Amazon at all or
2. I buy storage from Amazon and you provide managed access to it?
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
I understand that ISG requires a server (Node.js runtime) to run it, that's why I want to disable it for my SSG Next.js static site, but I can't figure out how. I just want static hosting like S3+Cloudfront which is much faster.
You need to use static export: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/deploy...
Cool, so that's what I was missing all along!
Unfortunately looks like I can't use it now since I am using `next-plausible` which does require a Node.js proxy...
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Presigned URLs are useful because client app can upload/download directly from S3, saving the app server from this traffic. Does Row-Level Security achieve the same benefit?
Yes, I agree! Although I should have specified that we support signed URL https://supabase.com/docs/reference/javascript/storage-from-... just not in the S3 protocol just yet :)
Thanks for confirming! Could you maybe update https://supabase.com/docs/guides/storage/s3/compatibility to include s3-esque presigning as a feature to track?
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not defending NextJS, I'm pretty out on it myself, but ISG requires a server to run. It pregenerates static content for defined pages and serves that until revalidating. If you've built a fully static bundle, nothing exists that would handle that incremental/revalidating logic.
I understand that ISG requires a server (Node.js runtime) to run it, that's why I want to disable it for my SSG Next.js static site, but I can't figure out how. I just want static hosting like S3+Cloudfront which is much faster.
[deleted]
Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol
#110Cool to see that Supabase is adding S3 protocol! Nice to see more and more storage solutions available. We, at Milvus, I've integrated S3, Parquet and other ones to make it possible for developers to use their data no matter what they use. For those who have used both, how do you find the performance and ease of integration compares between Supabase and other solutions like Milvus that have had these features for som…
Just make your own post if you’re selling your product