Live data from Hacker News

Say hello to Octicons

github.com

101–110 of 140 posts

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#101
post #60

Guess its a weird question but does anyone know what the make of propelling pencil is in the photo of their drafting process? I'd be keen to lay my hands on one!

I had the same reaction upon seeing that photo. My dominant hand has been in a cast for four months, so I've become left handed. The new dominant hand is rather picky about writing utensils, and this one looks like it fits the bill nicely.

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#104
Offtopic, but it's amazing to realize that Avalonstar is 11 years old! I guess I was pretty small when it started but I remember following Brian's work I guess as far back as my first computer purchase...

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#105
post #79
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. It's like expecting that when I adjust my seat to fit my leg length, the doors still work. I like the text to be readable without me leaning in and destroying my vision. The fact that I'm forced to override font sizes for usability because sites don't respect my default settings is bad enough. When they break because of it, it becomes terrible design.

+1 on the font size - that's a big problem in particular if you happen to have a large screen. But forcing everything into the same font seems a bit excessive; I've actually seen a couple of sites make really nice use of fonts, and you can still install an extension that turns your page into an "easy reading" mode on a key press. What do you do about fixed width vs proportional fonts?

All browsers I've seen that allow you to override settings allow you to do it by family (sans, serif, fixed, etc)

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#106
post #100

We should tell them we don't like it instead of just commenting in a HN thread. Tweet them, or something. Bitbucket looks great still.

I'm not a fan of Bitbucket for various reasons, but your point is well-taken - I tweeted them just now myself:

>generally like the octicons, except (a) some are too detailed, and (b) the colored bkgrds are confusing. (still a fan!)

Then again, I'm pretty sure GitHubbers will be watching this thread. ;)

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#107
post #62
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've given it some thought and GitHub should be able to make this more accessible by doing something like this: Notifications Using media queries, serve CSS like this only to screen-like media (i.e. not screen readers): .mini-icon.create:before { content: "\f030"; } .mini-icon span { display: none; } Hopefully they'll adopt something like this, though it wouldn't help people like me who just want a consistent font ac…

I think screen readers actually respect display:none. I believe the preferred solution is to use a large, negative text-indent.

I like this rather new solution, which actually works in older browsers including IE7 if you happen to need to support that. Still uses text-indent, but pushes it right instead of left and sets overflow hidden to hide it.

http://www.zeldman.com/2012/03/01/replacing-the-9999px-hack-...

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#108
post #58

Why isn't this SVG? Font icons are only applicable when there is actually an appropriate corresponding Unicode character for the icon, as text is supposed to be selectable/copyable, and display fine (albeit in a different typeface) if I turn off web fonts and have full Unicode coverage. Some of the icons that Github implements are in Unicode, yet they don't even use the characters for those. For an example of when it…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svg#Support_for_SVG_in_web_brow...

Every major current generation browser and last generation browser supports SVG images except IE 8. So IE 8 users just wouldn't see the icons - not a big loss since I suspect IE 8 users make up a tiny amount of the user base.

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#109
post #79
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. It's like expecting that when I adjust my seat to fit my leg length, the doors still work. I like the text to be readable without me leaning in and destroying my vision. The fact that I'm forced to override font sizes for usability because sites don't respect my default settings is bad enough. When they break because of it, it becomes terrible design.

+1 on the font size - that's a big problem in particular if you happen to have a large screen. But forcing everything into the same font seems a bit excessive; I've actually seen a couple of sites make really nice use of fonts, and you can still install an extension that turns your page into an "easy reading" mode on a key press. What do you do about fixed width vs proportional fonts?

I'm not the original poster, but I also force my browser to render in a particular font (specifically, same font used in the rest of my desktop applications).

In my experience, I'd say about 0.5% of pages are fancy demos of things you can do with web-font support, 1% of pages use custom web-fonts but look just fine without them, and 0.1% of pages are like GitHub where they actually require a custom font. Everything else uses some "web safe" font, and often very little care is given to selecting which one. Forcing everything into the same font is an excellent solution for the 98.4% of sites that don't use custom fonts, and an decent solution for 99.4% of sites.

It should be noted that most of the "easy reading mode" extensions only work well for article-type pages, not for sites like Hacker News or Reddit.

Re: Say hello to Octicons

#110
post #88
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't SVG universal?

It should be but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svg#Support_for_SVG_in_web_brow...

http://caniuse.com/#search=svg is a more visual look at this.

Every major current and previous generation browser supports SVG images except IE 8. IE 8 users just wouldn't see the icons - a reasonably graceful degradation.

Post reply on HN