Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suppose I didn't (and still don't) understand why you singled out US and GB. Here's my take of the topic: 1. Wikipedia editions are not defined by region but by language, and the relationship between regions and languages is many-to-many. English is spoken (as a dominant language) in US/UK/CA/IE/AU/IN/... among others and German is spoken in DE/AT/CH/IT/... among others. 2. English is one of the language editions.…
> why you singled out US and GB let's take him at his word, "it's thin outside the US and GB." OK, hmmm, how do we get more global coverage? oh, of course, France would be fr.wiki and Germany would be de.wiki, that would really increase global coverage. now you come in and say "but what about Canada, Australia, etc? there is no nz.wiki et al?" And then you have some ideas about how to do that, ideas which are not str…
> OK, hmmm, how do we get more global coverage?
Like I said, combine all the Wikipedia editions using Wikidata.
> oh, of course, France would be fr.wiki and Germany would be de.wiki
And of course, what language is e.g. Belgium (in your model)?
> And then you have some ideas about how to do that, ideas which are not strictly "wikipedia"
In this strict case, how do you remove duplicates (between the different language editions)?