Live data from Hacker News

The weirdest bug I've seen yet

engineering.gusto.com

101–110 of 334 posts

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#101
post #63

> Using open-source Chromium instead of Chrome did not cause crashes, so we couldn’t see what Chrome code was failing either. They don't address why they didn't just run Chromium. Or Firefox. (This is potentially better than the 'solution' they much later ended up with, in which they probably only relieved a symptom of an underlying problem that can exhibit again, and in the meantime is a zero-day exploit waiting to…

You really want to change an entire company’s mandated browser every time a bug causes a problem with an extension?

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#102
post #96
post #63

> Using open-source Chromium instead of Chrome did not cause crashes, so we couldn’t see what Chrome code was failing either. They don't address why they didn't just run Chromium. Or Firefox. (This is potentially better than the 'solution' they much later ended up with, in which they probably only relieved a symptom of an underlying problem that can exhibit again, and in the meantime is a zero-day exploit waiting to…

You must not have read the article because he literally addresses this.

*She – the author’s name is Amy

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#103

I don't think I would believe myself if I found this being a specific gif. This is a great amount of coincidences in code to cause this. Grammarly is an application that I don't get. The fact that people are installing, basically spyware, on their computers just to get grammar suggestions to make their writing more boring and add a spellchecker (which is already inside web browsers) is pretty astounding to me. The fa…

> Grammarly is an application that I don't get.

You write like a native speaker, so I'm not surprised. But imagine having a few years of school-German, and then taking a German language job. I'd bet there would be times you'd want a writing assistant, too.

There are also plenty of native English speakers who for whatever reason got a crappy education, and didn't get a lot of writing feedback.

As far as corporate security goes, you are correct, and we ban it. But I get why people want it.

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#104
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was it actually a Chrome bug though? It only happened when the Grammerly desktop app was installed. My guess is grammerly is doing something sketchy.

Does Grammerly hook something in Chrome? If not, then it's still probably a Chrome bug, even if some second-order effect of Grammerly is necessary to trigger it.

I'm thinking the same thing. It could be that Grammerly injects it's own loading spinner with the same filename into the HTML.

I wish they tried to simply rename the file instead of remove it.

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#105

I don't think I would believe myself if I found this being a specific gif. This is a great amount of coincidences in code to cause this. Grammarly is an application that I don't get. The fact that people are installing, basically spyware, on their computers just to get grammar suggestions to make their writing more boring and add a spellchecker (which is already inside web browsers) is pretty astounding to me. The fa…

There are a lot of people whose professional outcomes are meaningfully constrained by their ability produce clear business English.

I know a guy who used to get inexplicable feedback about his communication that boiled down to “write better.” This limited his ability to get promoted. He runs all his comms through ChatGPT and asks it to “make this more professional” and doesn’t get that feedback anymore.

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#106
post #63

> Using open-source Chromium instead of Chrome did not cause crashes, so we couldn’t see what Chrome code was failing either. They don't address why they didn't just run Chromium. Or Firefox. (This is potentially better than the 'solution' they much later ended up with, in which they probably only relieved a symptom of an underlying problem that can exhibit again, and in the meantime is a zero-day exploit waiting to…

> They don't address why they didn't just run Chromium. Or Firefox. Probably: 1. Because it is reasonable to expect the application to work in Chrome. 2. Chromium isn't intended for production use cases. Back when IE and Chrome had about equal market share, I worked somewhere that had one team insisting that all employees must use IE for one of their applications, and another team insisting that all employees use Chr…

I don't think the post you quoted is implying that they should've closed their eyes.

It makes much more sense to try a different browser first and see if the problem persists. Instead of test versions and extensions.

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#108

The main reason for tabs to crash is running out of RAM. Never do you see the guy investigating memory usage, which is weird.

Yeah, that would have been a good first step, but he does admit to not really knowing much about browsers: > This was fairly far outside the usual scope of our on-call issues. Our team is generally well-insulated by other teams from issues like browser compatibility, so I didn’t know the first thing about browser debugging.

[flagged]

Re: The weirdest bug I've seen yet

#110
post #103

I don't think I would believe myself if I found this being a specific gif. This is a great amount of coincidences in code to cause this. Grammarly is an application that I don't get. The fact that people are installing, basically spyware, on their computers just to get grammar suggestions to make their writing more boring and add a spellchecker (which is already inside web browsers) is pretty astounding to me. The fa…

> Grammarly is an application that I don't get. You write like a native speaker, so I'm not surprised. But imagine having a few years of school-German, and then taking a German language job. I'd bet there would be times you'd want a writing assistant, too. There are also plenty of native English speakers who for whatever reason got a crappy education, and didn't get a lot of writing feedback. As far as corporate secu…

> As far as corporate security goes, you are correct, and we ban it. But I get why people want it.

That is what stuck out to me: Installing rando applications on your corporate computer that has access to internal stuff... Whoooaaaa Baby! That's just a security disaster waiting to happen. It's stuff like this that eventually leads to draconian and crappy "Nobody gets admin access to their machines" corporate policies coming down.

Most TechCorp places I worked, if someone installed something like that on their corporate device, they'd get at least a stern talking-to and probably sent back to security training.

Post reply on HN