101–105 of 105 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What sort of "accountability" do you have in mind?
To admit what they said was wrong about X topic for a starter, but the polarization is so strong on all sides these days that such accountability will be taken as a defeat (or caved in) unfortunately.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that Alex Jones and Fox could exist without permission or friction improves American society.
Alex Jones and Fox could exist without permission or friction They have both been sued for billions of dollars and lost in court for sustained campaigns of damaging lies. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/10/us/politics/alex-jones-sa...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Alex Jones and Fox could exist without permission or friction They have both been sued for billions of dollars and lost in court for sustained campaigns of damaging lies. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/10/us/politics/alex-jones-sa...
Evidence of a lacking in free speech isn't an argument for more regulated speech.
All I did was point out that they aren't able to say whatever they want without permission or friction because there are consequences to intentionally lying over time to hurt people.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To admit what they said was wrong about X topic for a starter, but the polarization is so strong on all sides these days that such accountability will be taken as a defeat (or caved in) unfortunately.
Who defines "wrong," and why can't whoever that is simply publish their own content explaining why the other content was "wrong?"