Live data from Hacker News

Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

isro.gov.in

101–110 of 542 posts

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not considering such a basic error condition seems like a gross omission. This can't even come from the software engineering, but must be some kind of managerial failure (e.g. we're short on time, but have to report great progress to my boss, so skip this scenario).

That's probably why they haven't officially straight-up announced the issue. This wouldn't be the first time that a mission failed due to embarrassing failures in basic software practices (eg Starliner's initial software bugs emerging from a lack of integrated testing). Main difference is that you aren't triggering a billion overly sensitive nationalistic folks when you point out similar embarrassing errors in most o…

[dead]

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#108
post #12

Scott Manly has a video on why he thinks the last one failed. It sounds like their landing software didn't have "oh crap, we're way off course, just land wherever". It only had the happy path of "fly to here and land", so when it switched to the landing phase it tried valiently (including flying upside down) to try to fly back to the landing zone, but the landing zone was much further than fuel supplies allowed. Hope…

Not considering such a basic error condition seems like a gross omission. This can't even come from the software engineering, but must be some kind of managerial failure (e.g. we're short on time, but have to report great progress to my boss, so skip this scenario).

Writing code for something that flies into space is not nearly as easy as you think it is. Perhaps the next time you write a comment you could first develop the software which you're complaining about first. I'm sure it would be a trivial task for someone of your stature :)
Post reply on HN