Live data from Hacker News

Your brain on emoji

nautil.us

101–110 of 184 posts

Re: Your brain on emoji

#101
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, in slack an emoji response doesn't need to be cleared (so it doesn't count toward a notification count). That is what got me on board.

And if you send a message that's only + , slack will use it as a reaction on the immediately preceding message

Ok, this could trim some valuable time from my work day, thanks! Although I guess that could be risky in multi-person chats...

Re: Your brain on emoji

#103
post #8

Did you know ? Eastern europeans end words (without space) with singles characters "(" and ")" to indicate full smileys. Only themselves understand each others and they dont tell anyone about it)))

From my old WoW-playing days, I was given to understand that : was awkward to reach on cyrillic keyboards, so many of the russians skipped it and just used ) or even %) sometimes (which sort of looks like eyes and a nose if you squint)

Re: Your brain on emoji

#104
post #25
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never heard emoticons referred to as emoji, mainly because people don't use emoticons anymore (unless they still post on forums). It seems like a deliberate editorial decision. I would prefer to preserve the distinction, however, for reasons GP stated.

I use emoticons when texting (because I'm a graybeard), but my phone translates them into emojis before sending. So I've just taken to calling them all emojis.

Do you mean you use smileys like :) :( :P ?

Emotions were the little images you could place amongst text in MSN Messenger.

Re: Your brain on emoji

#105
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is this possible? I thought HN stripped emojis.

It's the “black heart suit”.

Yes, it's U+2665, which is considered to be an emoji according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji#In_Unicode, though U+2661 ("white heart suit", ♡) isn't. Probably HN treats ♥ and ♡ the same way, as ordinary characters, though.

Re: Your brain on emoji

#106

Emojis in written text can lose their meaning in translation. Your intended meaning may not be what your audience understands, but I guess that’s inherent in most communication. I had a bunch of russian coworkers once, and one of them would constantly type “)))” any time I asked him a question. I thought it was some weird cyrillic keyboard quirk and never paid it any mind, until I learned it’s the approximate russian…

":" is cumbersome to type in on a Russian keyboard, so just ")" is used. Back in IRC days it would look like

`vlad: )`

Re: Your brain on emoji

#107
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use emoticons when texting (because I'm a graybeard), but my phone translates them into emojis before sending. So I've just taken to calling them all emojis.

Do you mean you use smileys like :) :( :P ? Emotions were the little images you could place amongst text in MSN Messenger.

As far as I recall it was pretty common to call :-) etc emoticons back in the day. Like 1990s/early 2000s.

Re: Your brain on emoji

#108
post #20
post #8

Did you know ? Eastern europeans end words (without space) with singles characters "(" and ")" to indicate full smileys. Only themselves understand each others and they dont tell anyone about it)))

Why eastern europeans in particular? Is it somehow related to slavic languages? Now I'm curious

It's the Russian keyboard layout that makes ":" difficult to type.

In Poland we just use the US keyboard layout so that's not a problem. I assume it's similar for other non-cyrillic slavic languages.

Re: Your brain on emoji

#109
post #29

I’m starting to think that Hacker News is on the wrong side of history on this one. Without the emotional channel, we make more misunderstandings, which leads to more hostile posts. Emoji are becoming a permanent part of written language. I don’t want to see a post full of emoji either, but perhaps a filter that allows one emoji per 20 words would work. Perhaps using a font with black line or grayscale emoji?

> Without the emotional channel, we make more misunderstandings, which leads to more hostile posts.

For me at least, seeing emoji makes me even more uncertain about the meaning of the message.

Re: Your brain on emoji

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The irony of using the normative "should" to project your preferences onto Firefox, while expressing a desire that Firefox not do so on you. Firefox is not a person, why should it have "preferences"? It's a tool. Tools should be used because they're useful, not because they "prefer to be used."

It could be argued that the user above chose to use Firefox. They chose to use this in their minds inferior tool or a tool with an undesirable feature. They made that decision. > A bad workman always blames his tools –Old proverb

Is the argument here that developers should no longer test their sites in FF?
Post reply on HN