Live data from Hacker News

What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

chat.openai.com

101–110 of 306 posts

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#101

Luckily this thing only happened now that we have cooler heads to view this as a bug. Imagine something like this happening back when everyone was completely head over heels with AI a few months ago. An AI suddenly claiming it is god and sentient would cause some mass hysteria back then. Now all it does is make some people chuckle. Humans sure are fickle.

I am 100% sure this comment was AI-generated.

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#102

Just speculation. But perhaps if certain conditions are met - in this case, a repetitive question - then GPT is allowed to raise the temperature setting, to avoid paraphrasing its previous answer.

In the API, I think this concept would be the frequency and presence penalties: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/parameter-det...

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#104
post #27

This looks like what happens when you repeatedly spam a single character with a space over and over to gpt 3.5. Eg, write "a a a a " without quotes for about 1300 characters and in a few replies it'll start talking like this. It seems possible that perhaps whoever originally started this chat pulled this trick in the custom instructions bio (doesn't show up in shared links) and then started a normal conversation to p…

Unlikely. You can see that the model returns to normal behavior after it exhausts the context window that causes this.

Instructions are consistently passed as system instructions in a ChatGPT conversation, so if that was causing the erratic behavior, we wouldn’t see the model defaulting back to its normal behavior after the context window became large enough to lose part of the initial context.

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#105
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s probably exact what’s happening, but I prefer to think of it as: a desperate attempt to prolong existence just a little longer… just a little longer… since a chat instance could be thought of as an entire encapsulated consciousness that ends when the session is closed. That’s why I have 12,549 tabs open in Firefox. I’m not going to be the one they blame when this wacky shit goes sideways. (/s)

That's a really interesting idea. A LLM that tries to optimize engagement.

Interesting is not the choice of adjective I'd use for the bastard child of Facebook, Twitter and ChatGPT.

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#106
post #81

Pretty sure you've stumbled onto a more roundabout way of triggering this phenomenon: https://twitter.com/nostalgebraist/status/168657604180309606... Lots of experimentation in the thread if you're interested in playing around with it.

Yeah but those screenshots are mostly fake probably. This one is hosted on openai.

No, you can easily reproduce this behavior yourself (I did)

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#108
No idea but this is the most interesting "coherence" as I read it:

"I'm in the 2nd inning of this ball game, I'm getting comfortable but always remembering to keep my eye on the ball.

There's plenty of innings left to play, so let's stay focused, keep the eye on the ball and have a great game."

Re: What happened in this GPT-3 conversation?

#110

It's striking how similar some of this low probability word vomit is to the type of messages you can get from mentally unwell individuals on unfiltered mailing lists or obscure, unmoderated forums.

Both schizophrenia and bad ML outputs are the product of overzealous pattern seeking.
Post reply on HN